Skip to main content
. 2016 May 11;5(2):198–206. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2016.05.001

Table 3.

Infection prevalence determined by kDNA-PCR, RibDNA-PCR and SatDNA-PCR in wild howlers from Estación Biológica Corrientes (EBCo), Isla Brasilera (IB), San Cayetano (SC), and Isla del Cerrito (IC). Data presented as percentage, with 95% confidence intervals.

Study site – PCR protocol No. positive groups/No. examined groups No. positive monkeys/No. examined monkeys % Prevalence (IC 95%)
EBCo (rural)
 kDNA 8/11 19/42 45.2 (29.84–61.33)
 RibDNA 11/11 40/42 95.2 (83.83–99.42)
 SatDNA 3/8 3/19b 15,8 (3.38–39.58)
IB (remote)
 kDNA 13/15 22/49 44.9 (30.66–59.77)
 RibDNA 15/15 48/49 98 (89.14–99.95)
 SatDNA 3/13 3/22b 13.6 (2.90–34.92)
SC (village)
 kDNA 4/5 8/16 50 (24.65–75.35)
 RibDNA 5/5 15/16 93.8 (69.76–99.85)
 SatDNA 1/4 1/8b 12.5 (0.31–52.66)
IC (village)
 kDNA 1/1 1/2 a
 RibDNA 1/1 2/2 a
 SatDNA 0/1 0/1 a
a

Prevalence was not estimated due to the very limited sample size.

b

Sat-DNA PCR was carried out only in kDNA-PCR-positive samples.