Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 23;37(5):102. doi: 10.1007/s11357-015-9839-0

Table 2.

Performances of the SAMP8 mice in the memory tasks

Tasks Phases Parameters Old control Young control HD-DNJ group LD-DNJ group
Novel object recognition 10-min phase Tt (s) 7.7 ± 0.6 13.0 ± 1.4* 6.7 ± 0.3 7.6 ± 0.6
PI (%) 49.2 ± 2.6 62.6 ± 1.1* 65.8 ± 3.0* 63.2 ± 3.4*
24-h phase Tt (s) 6.4 ± 0.3 12.2 ± 1.0* 7.2 ± 0.4 7.2 ± 0.3
PI (%) 48.5 ± 3.1 47.4 ± 1.7 52.7 ± 3.2 51.6 ± 3.1
Novel location recognition 10-min phase Tt (s) 5.7 ± 0.5 8.3 ± 0.6* 5.9 ± 1.3 5.6 ± 0.8
PI (%) 51.0 ± 3.7 63.9 ± 2.8* 63.7 ± 3.4* 61.1 ± 5.1*
24-h phase Tt (s) 5.2 ± 0.6 6.7 ± 0.5 5.1 ± 0.5 4.5 ± 0.4
PI (%) 51.6 ± 4.2 57.5 ± 3.1 54.7 ± 4.7 51.1 ± 4.3
Episodic-like memory Tt (s) 23.1 ± 0.6 38.3 ± 0.7* 30.0 ± 1.0* 36.2 ± 1.6*
PIo (%) 50.4 ± 0.8 59.6 ± 0.7* 55.5 ± 0.8* 56.4 ± 1.0*
PIod (%) 49.6 ± 2.8 57.8 ± 0.8* 55.9 ± 0.8* 54.8 ± 0.4*

Data are expressed as mean ± SEM

PI preference index for novel object in the NOR or for novel location in the NLR, PIo preference index for old objects, PIod preference index for displaced old object, Tt total exploring time

*P < 0.05 denotes significant difference compared to the old controls