Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 4;38(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s11357-015-9866-x

Table 2.

Negative binomial generalised linear models showing the direction of effects and the significance level of the terms in the underwater photos and drawings discrimination

Response variable Model Minimal model Average effect SE Wald statistic z p value
Number of sessions to criterion Model 1 Stimulus group: underwater 1.3841 0.1389 68.704 <0.001
Age in months 0.0072 0.0018 14.224 <0.001
Model 2 Age group 14.627 0.006
Age group 2 0.0109 0.1969 0.055 0.956
Age group 3 0.1200 0.2025 0.593 0.553
Age group 4 0.4832 0.1937 2.495 0.013
Age group 5 0.6104 0.2121 2.877 0.004
Number of correction trials Model 3 Stimulus group: Underwater 1.7887 0.1470 88.076 <0.001
Age in months 0.0067 0.0022 9.584 0.002
Model 4 Age group 11.181 0.025
Age group 2 −0.0631 0.2135 −0.295 0.768
Age group 3 0.3723 0.2155 1.728 0.084
Age group 4 0.4144 0.2151 1.927 0.054
Age group 5 0.5741 0.2412 2.383 0.017

Z tests indicate which age groups differ from age group 1 in the respective analysis. Bold numbers indicate significant values at p = ≤0.05