Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 4;38(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s11357-015-9866-x

Table 3.

Negative binomial generalised linear models showing the direction of effects and the significance level of the terms in the clip art picture discrimination (training for task 3: inferential reasoning by exclusion)

Response variable Model Minimal model Average effect SE Wald statistic z p value
Number of sessions to criterion Model 5 Age in months 0.0100 0.0017 32.326 <0.001
Stimulus group: B 0.2707 0.1095 5.908 0.015
Sex: male 0.3507 0.1169 8.710 0.003
Reward ratio 90 % 0.3486 0.1545 4.877 0.027
Model 6 Age group 29.633 <0.001
Age group 2 0.0612 0.2046 0.2990 0.765
Age group 3 0.1162 0.2088 0.5570 0.578
Age group 4 0.6525 0.2193 2.9750 0.003
Age group 5 0.8879 0.2215 4.0090 <0.001
Number of correction trials Model 7 Age in months 0.0118 0.0019 37.953 <0.001
Stimulus group: B 0.4313 0.1250 11.169 <0.001
Sex: male 0.3184 0.1253 6.296 0.012
Model 8 Age group 32.130 <0.001
Age group 2 0.3174 0.2287 1.388 0.165
Age group 3 0.2992 0.2338 1.280 0.201
Age group 4 0.6798 0.2490 2.730 0.006
Age group 5 1.2756 0.2525 5.053 <0.001

Z tests indicate which age groups differ from age group 1 in the respective analysis. Bold numbers indicate significant values at p = ≤0.05