Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 4;38(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s11357-015-9866-x

Table 5.

Generalised linear model on the proportion of times the dogs’ chose S’ when paired with the known negative (test 1 refresher) and also chose S’ in the subsequent trial when S’ was paired with the novel S” (test 2 trial) in the inference by exclusion task, showing the direction of effects and the significance level of the terms

Response variable Model Minimal model Average effect SE Wald statistic /deviance z p value
Proportion of times chose S’ in both test 1 refresher trial and test 2 trial Model 12 Age in months 0.0099 0.0014 45.538 <0.001
Stimulus: group B 0.7027 0.1367 27.739 <0.001
Model 13 Age group 54.570 <0.001
Age group 2 0.4654 0.2816 1.653 0.094
Age group 3 0.6387 0.2989 2.137 0.033
Age group 4 1.2223 0.2900 4.215 <0.001
Age group 5 1.3916 0.2788 4.992 <0.001
Model 14 Sessions to criterion 0.0008 0.0029 0.082 0.775
Model 15 Total no. of correction trials 0.0006 0.0003 4.103 0.043

Z tests indicate which age groups differ from age group 1 in the respective analysis. Age in months was included in models 12 and 13 to control for age effects. Bold numbers indicate significant values at p = ≤0.05