Table 5.
Generalised linear model on the proportion of times the dogs’ chose S’ when paired with the known negative (test 1 refresher) and also chose S’ in the subsequent trial when S’ was paired with the novel S” (test 2 trial) in the inference by exclusion task, showing the direction of effects and the significance level of the terms
Response variable | Model | Minimal model | Average effect | SE | Wald statistic /deviance | z | p value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proportion of times chose S’ in both test 1 refresher trial and test 2 trial | Model 12 | Age in months | 0.0099 | 0.0014 | 45.538 | <0.001 | |
Stimulus: group B | 0.7027 | 0.1367 | 27.739 | <0.001 | |||
Model 13 | Age group | 54.570 | <0.001 | ||||
Age group 2 | 0.4654 | 0.2816 | 1.653 | 0.094 | |||
Age group 3 | 0.6387 | 0.2989 | 2.137 | 0.033 | |||
Age group 4 | 1.2223 | 0.2900 | 4.215 | <0.001 | |||
Age group 5 | 1.3916 | 0.2788 | 4.992 | <0.001 | |||
Model 14 | Sessions to criterion | 0.0008 | 0.0029 | 0.082 | 0.775 | ||
Model 15 | Total no. of correction trials | 0.0006 | 0.0003 | 4.103 | 0.043 |
Z tests indicate which age groups differ from age group 1 in the respective analysis. Age in months was included in models 12 and 13 to control for age effects. Bold numbers indicate significant values at p = ≤0.05