Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 16;37(1):49–55. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgv160

Table 3.

Gene-wide significant tested SNPs for all breast cancer, ER+ tumors or ER− tumors

All cases versus controls ER+ cases versus controls ER− cases versus Controls P-heterogenerityf
Gene SNP Function Allelesa MAFb Imputation r 2 c OR (95% CI)d Nominal P P adj e OR (95% CI)d Nominal P P adj OR (95% CI)d Nominal P P adj
TSC2 rs181088346 Intron G/A 0.06 0.909/0.802 0.77 (0.65–0.88) 2.7×10−4 0.035 0.73 (0.61–0.88) 0.0010 0.13 0.88 (0.70–1.09) 0.25 1.0 0.22
BRAF rs114729114 Intron C/T 0.03 0.728/0.950 1.53 (1.24–1.91) 1.1×10−4 0.012 1.44 (1.10–1.87) 0.0069 0.79 2.03 (1.50–2.76) 5.6 x 10-6 0.001 0.006
PGF rs11542848 5′-UTR C/T 0.08 0.983/0.923 1.14 (1.01–1.29) 0.035 1.0 1.13 (0.97–1.31) 0.08 1.0 1.38 (1.15–1.66) 4.5 x 10-4 0.049 0.22
PGF rs61759375 Intron C/T 0.11 0.975/0.884 1.11 (1.00–1.24) 0.051 1.0 1.07 (0.94–1.22) 0.29 1.0 1.34 (1.14–1.57) 2.9 x 10-4 0.032 0.06
MAPK3 rs78564187 Intron G/A 0.18 Genotyped/0.966 1.07 (0.98–1.16) 0.13 1.0 1.03 (0.92–1.14) 0.63 1.0 1.26 (1.11–1.43) 3.4 x 10-4 0.006 0.004

aMajor/minor alleles.

bMinor allele frequency among controls.

c r 2 for imputed SNPs in the CBCS, WCHS and BWHS genotyping project/the MEC genotyping project.

dAdditive model with each SNP coded as 0, 1 or 2 copies of the minor allele, adjusting for age, study, geographic location, DNA source and principal components of the genotypes.

eBonferroni-corrected P values; bold P adj are significant at the 0.05 level.

fCalculated using a case–case only logistic regression model comparing ER− cases with ER+ cases.