Table 3.
Variable | Overall Patient Population (N = 104) |
Micafungin 300 mg 3×/wk (N = 78) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Univariate Analysisa |
Univariate Analysisa |
|||||
OR | (95% CI) | P Value | OR | (95% CI) | P Value | |
Demographics | ||||||
Age, ≥50 y vs <50 y | 0.97 | (.37–2.54) | .95 | 0.86 | (.28–2.66) | .79 |
Sex, female | 1.14 | (.45–2.94) | .78 | 0.90 | (.29–2.79) | .86 |
Race, white | 0.57 | (.21–1.54) | .26 | 0.68 | (.20–2.29) | .53 |
Underlying disease | ||||||
Acute leukemia vs other | 1.59 | (.60–4.19) | .35 | 1.45 | (.46–4.57) | .52 |
Laboratory variables | ||||||
Baseline abnormal liver function vs normalb | 2.36 | (.87–6.40) | .09 | 1.60 | (.49–5.22) | .44 |
Baseline abnormal renal function vs normalc | 0.92 | (.24–3.60) | .91 | 0.49 | (.06–4.26) | .52 |
Micafungin-related variables | ||||||
Duration of micafungin administration | ||||||
≤4 wk | 1 | 1 | ||||
5–8 wk | 1.05 | (.35–3.17) | .53 | 0.83 | (.21–3.24) | .91 |
9–12 wk | 0.37 | (.07–1.86) | .19 | 0.57 | (.10–3.15) | .50 |
>12 wk | 1.10 | (.25–4.86) | .57 | 1.24 | (.20–7.53) | .60 |
Group 1 vs all othersd | 0.65 | (.23–1.82) | .41 | NA | NA | NA |
Micafungin daily dose estimate | ||||||
<1.5 mg/kg | NA | 1 | ||||
1.5–2 mg/kg | NA | 0.53 | (.12–2.29) | .40 | ||
>2 mg/kg | NA | 0.84 | (.22–3.21) | .82 |
Liver impairment was defined as any of the following: aspartate and alanine aminotransferase >3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) and alkaline phosphatase and total bilirubin >2 times the ULN.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; NA, not applicable; OR, odds ratio.
a No variable was eligible to stay in the stepwise selection multivariate model.
b Abnormal baseline liver function was defined as ≥1 of the following: aspartate and alanine aminotransferase >3 times the ULN and alkaline phosphatase and total bilirubin >2 times the ULN.
c Abnormal baseline renal function was defined as creatinine clearance <50 mL/minute.
d Group 1 included 78 patients who received 300 mg micafungin 3 times weekly for ≥75% of their course.