Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 10;35(7):784–793. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjv066

Table 4.

Rhinoplasty Patient FACE-Q Scores: Race/Ethnicity

FACE-Q Scale (Range, 0-100) Prerhinoplasty
Postrhinoplasty
Pre vs Post
N Mean (SD) Adjusted
Meana
N Mean (SD) Adjusted
Meana
Δ P-value
Satisfaction with facial appearance
 Caucasian 31 44.1 (13.0) 44.2 24 73.5 (22.0) 73.3 +29.1 <.01*
 Non-Caucasian 10 53.7 (17.4) 51.8 5 63.8 (18.4) 67.6 +15.8 .17
Social function
 Caucasian 29 59.0 (26.8) 59.0 24 74.0 (21.8) 73.9 +14.9 <.01*
 Non-Caucasian 9 74.6 (29.4) 67.7 5 75.6 (33.6) 87.9 +20.2 .25
Psychological well-being
 Caucasian 29 61.1 (19.5) 61.2 24 78.7 (21.5) 78.6 +17.4 <.01*
 Non-Caucasian 9 71.3 (18.2) 67.8 5 79.2 (23.3) 85.8 +18.0 .18
Satisfaction with nose items (range, 1-4)
 “Size
  Caucasian 27 2.0 (0.9) 2.1 24 3.3 (0.9) 3.2 +1.1 <.01*
  Non-Caucasian 10 2.2 (1.0) 2.1 5 3.0 (1.0) 3.1 +1.0 .18
 “Shape
  Caucasian 27 1.6 (0.6) 1.6 24 3.2 (0.9) 3.2 +1.6 <.01*
  Non-Caucasian 9 2.3 (1.1) 2.3 5 3.2 (1.1) 3.3 +1.0 .23
 “Profile
  Caucasian 27 1.6 (0.8) 1.5 24 3.3 (0.8) 3.3 +1.8 <.01*
  Non-Caucasian 10 2.3 (1.2) 2.3 5 3.2 (0.8) 3.3 +1.0 .16
 “In the mirror
  Caucasian 27 1.7 (0.8) 1.8 24 3.3 (0.9) 3.3 +1.5 <.01*
  Non-Caucasian 10 2.1 (1.0) 2.0 5 3.2 (0.8) 3.3 +1.3 .04*
 “In photos
  Caucasian 27 1.5 (0.6) 1.5 24 3.3 (0.8) 3.2 +1.7 <.01*
  Non-Caucasian 10 2.1 (0.9) 2.0 5 2.8 (0.8) 3.0 +1.0 .08

SD, standard deviation; Δ, difference between the pre- and post-mean scores. aThe “Adjusted” mean scores were calculated using a mixed linear regression model which included the factor Pre vs Post-rhinoplasty and covariates: age, gender, income, and primary vs revision rhinoplasty. *P-value is significant (<.05).