Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 30;16(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0202-7

Table 11.

Power to select the optimal embedded adaptive intervention strategy for designs in Figs. 1 and 3

Comparison of designs in Figs. 1 and 3 β 12 β 22 β 23 β 32 β 41 β 42 Power to select optimal embedded adaptive strategy
Time-varying SMART Standard SMART
Without interaction 0.4 0.5 0.5 2 82.8 % 83.0 %
0.3 −0.2 0.4 2 60.2 % 59.2 %
0.3 −0.5 0.4 2 76.2 % 75.0 %
With interaction 0.4 0.5 0.5 2 0.5 −0.3 99.2 % 97.0 %
0.6 0.5 0.4 2 0.2 0.2 63 % 62.8 %
0.6 −0.5 −0.5 2 0.2 −0.3 72.2 % 73.4 %