Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 30;16(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0202-7

Table 3.

Simulation results for the design in Fig. 1: the estimated means, based on 500 replicates, are reported for coefficients in model (4) with interactions

Parameter estimation
β 12 β 22 β 23 β 32 β 41 β 42
(first-stage interventions A 1) (second-stage interventions for responders A 2R) (second-stage interventions for non-responders A 2NR) (time of intervention T 2) (interaction term A 1. A 2R) (interaction term A 1. A 2NR)
True value −0.4 0.5 0.4 2.0 0.55 −0.40
Joint model Estimate −0.381 0.490 0.389 1.626 0.542 −0.397
MSE 0.014 0.038 0.019 0.305 0.037 0.019
CI% 97.4 % 95.6 % 96.8 % 87.0 % 96.8 % 98.0 %
Length of CI 0.521 0.789 0.593 1.671 0.789 0.593
TVMEM Estimate −0.530 0.489 0.390 4.122 0.542 −0.396
MSE 0.029 0.039 0.020 4.697 0.037 0.020
CI% 88.2 % 95.8 % 96.4 % 0.0 % 97.0 % 97.8 %
Length of CI 0.525 0.809 0.605 1.618 0.809 0.605

CI%: Coverage probability of the 95 % confidence interval

MSE mean squared error