Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 13;16(2):368–382. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxu049

Table 4.

Inline graphic selection comparison: Inline graphic estimation performance

Inline graphic
Bias-corrected Inline graphic
Scenario Inline graphic Inline graphic RS SND Mean Inline graphic RS SND Mean Inline graphic
Case 1
Inline graphic 18.73 2.61 5.30 3.37 3.81 3.02 0.08 1.02
Inline graphic 18.73 9.37 12.50 7.21 8.39 8.98 1.87 4.11
Inline graphic 18.73 1.76 4.15 2.57 2.94 2.09 -0.33 0.46
Case 2
Inline graphic 3.01 0.93 15.08 4.98 7.26 8.84 -3.79 -0.22
Inline graphic 3.01 0.57 10.20 3.53 5.03 5.63 -2.93 -0.55
Inline graphic 3.01 0.31 6.48 2.59 3.46 2.67 -2.82 -1.25
Case 3
Inline graphic 8.75 2.16 7.17 3.60 4.41 3.59 -1.50 0.03
Inline graphic 8.75 3.38 9.86 4.51 5.71 5.70 -1.43 0.64
Inline graphic 8.75 1.10 4.50 2.40 2.88 1.66 -1.61 -0.60
Case 4
Inline graphic 3.99 3.56 15.76 7.33 9.25 9.35 -1.52 1.77
Inline graphic 3.99 2.29 9.52 4.68 5.78 5.23 -1.22 0.74
Inline graphic 3.99 2.27 7.52 4.26 5.00 3.73 -1.01 0.45
Case 5
Inline graphic 0.00 0.00 5.87 2.12 2.96 2.33 -2.86 -1.37
Inline graphic 0.00 0.00 9.44 3.15 4.56 4.92 -3.20 -0.93
Inline graphic 0.00 0.00 3.44 1.34 1.81 0.68 -2.56 -1.59
Case 6
Inline graphic 0.00 0.00 17.95 5.46 8.27 10.79 -4.54 -0.26
Inline graphic 0.00 0.00 10.10 3.27 4.80 5.42 -3.24 -0.82
Inline graphic 0.00 0.00 7.45 2.75 3.80 3.33 -3.06 -1.25

Values represent averages across 500 simulated data sets.

Inline graphicAverages based on 497 and 499 data sets in Cases 1 and 3, respectively, due to numerical problems.