Table 4.
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Support for immigration restriction | 0.0925*** (0.0222) | 0.0828*** (0.0213) | 0.0747* (0.0292) | 0.0529+ (0.0293) | 0.0589* (0.0280) | 0.0364 (0.0279) |
Doctor satisfactiona | 0.180*** (0.0171) | 0.184*** (0.0213) | 0.185*** (0.0201) | |||
Confidence in scientific communityb | 0.211*** (0.0538) | 0.217*** (0.0464) | ||||
F-statistic | 5.11*** | 14.50*** | 3.97*** | 10.54*** | 4.58*** | 12.25*** |
Observations (N) | 1080 | 1080 | 579 | 579 | 579 | 579 |
Data: General Social Survey (2012).
Standard errors in parentheses.
All models control for all covariates presented in Table 2.
The Model 1 effect (0.0925) differs slightly from Table 2, Model 3 (0.0948) due to adding doctor satisfaction to the missing data imputation model.
Doctor satisfaction: “How satisfied or dissatisfied were you with the treatment you received: when you last visited a doctor?”(1) Completely satisfied, (2) Very satisfied, (3) Fairly satisfied, (4) Neither satisfied nor unsatisfied, (5) Fairly unsatisfied, (6) Very unsatisfied, and (7) Completely unsatisfied.
Confidence in scientific community: “I am going to name some institutions in this country. As far as the people running these institutions are concerned, would you say you have a great deal of confidence, only some confidence or hardly any confidence at all in them? Scientific community?” (1) A great deal, (2) Only some, and (3) Hardly any.
p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05; and +p < 0.10 (two-tailed).