Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 24;9(4):329–335. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2016.06.003

Table 2.

Summary of Important Prognostic Factors in Multivariate Analysis

The Original Unmatched Cohort
The Propensity-Matched Cohort
Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P* Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P
FFS
IC + IMRT vs IMRT + CC 0.99 (0.61-1.61) .963 0.82 (0.44-1.52) .522
Age (continuous) 1.00 (0.98-1.02) .940 1.01 (0.98-1.04) .488
Sex 0.92 (0.56-1.49) .730 1.04 (0.52-2.06) .911
Histology 0.50 (0.23-1.11) .089 1.69 (0.20-14.09) .628
T stage 1.65 (1.27-2.14) < .001 1.83 (1.24-2.69) .002
N stage 1.49 (1.12-1.98) .006 1.62 (0.94-2.79) .081



OS
IC + IMRT versus IMRT + CC 0.90 (0.46-1.75) .746 0.86 (0.39-1.89) .700
Age (continuous) 1.03 (1.00-1.05) .064 1.03 (0.99-1.07) .113
Sex 0.82 (0.42-1.62) .575 0.83 (0.34-1.99) .671
Histology 0.58 (0.21-1.64) .306
T stage 2.06 (1.40-3.03) < .001 2.75 (1.59-4.76) < .001
N stage 2.00 (1.37-2.90) < .001 2.25 (1.22-4.16) .009



DMFS
IC + IMRT versus IMRT + CC 1.09 (0.60-2.00) .776 0.85 (0.40-1.82) .672
Age (continuous) 1.00 (0.97-1.02) .690 0.99 (0.96-1.03) .741
Sex 0.81 (0.43-1.50) .499 1.16 (0.52-2.60) .724
Histology 0.48 (0.19-1.24) .129
T stage 1.67 (1.21-2.31) .002 2.22 (1.38-3.57) .001
N stage 1.90 (1.36-2.64) < .001 2.28 (1.21-4.31) .011



LRFS
IC + IMRT versus IMRT + CC 1.06 (0.45-2.47) .899 0.95 (0.30-3.00) .936
Age (continuous) 0.99 (0.96-1.02) .457 0.99 (0.94-1.04) .684
Sex 0.99 (0.44-2.22) .976 0.74 (0.19-2.96) .671
Histology 0.51 (0.15-1.71) .276 0.49 (0.06-3.67) .486
T stage 1.29 (0.86-1.93) .221 1.10 (0.64-1.89) .727
N stage 1.31 (0.80-2.12) .282 1.01 (0.37-2.77) .981

Adjusted for age (continuous), sex, histology, T stage, and N stage.

Adjusted for the same covariates with a robust variance estimator to account for the clustering within matched pair.