Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Genet. 2016 Aug 20;135(9):1029–1040. doi: 10.1007/s00439-016-1725-z

Table 1.

Genome editing in the mdx mouse. Summary of treatment and outcomes in three recent studies of in vivo genome editing with CRISPR/Cas9 delivered by AAV vectors for the correction of DMD in the mdx mouse model

Type of injection Long et al. Nelson et al. Tabebordbar et al.



IM RO IP IM to TA Tail vein IP IM to TA Tail vein IP
Administration age P12 P18 P1 8 weeks 8 weeks P2 6 weeks 6 weeks P3
Cas9 Streptococcus pyogenes Staphylococcus aureus Staphylococcus aureus
AAV serotype 9 8 8
Dose 1E13 1.8E13 6E12 1E12 5.4E12 5.6E11 1.5E12 3.6E13 3E12
Treatment duration (weeks) 3, 6 4, 8, 12 4, 8 8, 24 8 7 4 6 3
% Modification in gDNA 2 2
% Modification in cDNA 59 39
% Dystrophin restoration by Western 8 3-8
% Dystrophin-positive fibers by IHC 53 27 23 67
Muscle function improved Grip strength In situ TA force In situ TA force
Cardiac cell editing Yes Yes Yes
Satellite cell editing Yes

IM intramuscular, RO retroorbital, IP intraperitoneal, P days post-natal, TA tibialis anterior muscle