Table 2. Concordance between classification and bone marrow evaluation.
Classification (LDH) | Bone marrow evaluation | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pathologist 1 | Pathologist 2 | Pathologist 3 | Pathologist 4 | ||||||||||
ET | PV | prePMF | ET | PV | prePMF | ET | PV | prePMF | ET | PV | prePMF | ||
ET | 6 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
preMF | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
The concordance between the classification and hematopathologist 1, 2, 3, and 4 was 71%, 79%, 62%, and 38%. Three bone marrow biopsies were not suitable for analysis and therefore excluded from the study. Furthermore, pathologist 3 and 4 classified one of the ET bone marrow biopsies as unsuitable. In total, 14 bone marrow biopsies were evaluated by pathologist 1 and 2, and 13 bone marrow biopsies were evaluated by pathologist 3 and 4.