Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 31;11(8):e0161570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161570

Table 2. Concordance between classification and bone marrow evaluation.

Classification (LDH) Bone marrow evaluation
Pathologist 1 Pathologist 2 Pathologist 3 Pathologist 4
ET PV prePMF ET PV prePMF ET PV prePMF ET PV prePMF
ET 6 0 1 6 0 1 3 0 3 1 2 3
preMF 3 0 4 2 0 5 0 2 5 1 2 4

The concordance between the classification and hematopathologist 1, 2, 3, and 4 was 71%, 79%, 62%, and 38%. Three bone marrow biopsies were not suitable for analysis and therefore excluded from the study. Furthermore, pathologist 3 and 4 classified one of the ET bone marrow biopsies as unsuitable. In total, 14 bone marrow biopsies were evaluated by pathologist 1 and 2, and 13 bone marrow biopsies were evaluated by pathologist 3 and 4.