I. Decisions regarding settings and populations
|
Organization and setting |
Physical vs. virtual entity
Located within main hospital, satellite clinic, or separate from both
Outpatient vs inpatient care, or both
|
|
Principal population |
|
Degree of population focus impacts specificity of team training, potential for condition-specific research, referral stream, and breadth of prospective patient base
|
Nature of clinical services provided |
|
Affects all core decisions related to settings, populations, team, and organizational, staffing, administrative and financial issues
If provide both, offers fully integrative patient care but potentially competes with other primary care clinics
|
II. Decisions regarding composition, recruitment, and training of multi-disciplinary team
|
Selection of CAM practices and specific providers |
Choice of modalities to match targeted clinical conditions
Rules for qualifications and competencies for CAM providers (including state privileges, national certifications, licensure, etc)
|
Must take into consideration specific hospital guidelines for credentialing
Ability to work across medical cultures
Ability to work both as an independent provider of a specific discipline as well as a member of an interdisciplinary team
|
Original team training |
Duration, intensity, and content of trans-professional training activities (e.g. one single vs. extended program, experiential vs. didactic teaching)
Nature and philosophy of team communications (e.g. referrals, shared decision making, use of electronic medical records, etc)
|
|
Ongoing training of clinicians/team |
Content (clinical topics and case reviews, administrative issues), format, level of requirement, and frequency
|
Good for integrating of new team members
Opportunity for CME credits
Increased costs if not billable by team members
|
III. Decisions regarding role of research and educational initiatives
|
Scope of research activities |
Involvement in clinical services only vs. additional participation in research activities (e.g. health services, comparative effectiveness, efficacy, or basic research)
|
Initial establishment of research infrastructure requires individuals with research expertise and separate funding
Successful research program could impact academic credibility, financial sustainability of clinic, and continuing evidence-based education of clinicians
|
Scope of educational activities |
Nature of target audience (team members, other clinicians or employees within institution, trainees or fellows, patients and families, outside health professionals, or public)
|
Impacts visibility for referrals, credibility regarding evidence-base for IM, training of next generation of providers
Programs can be structured as “service” or investment with goal of marketing, or potential for fee revenue generators
|
IV. Decisions regarding organizational, administrative and financial issues
|
Reporting structure |
|
Implications for financial, organizational and legal responsibility for oversight and sustainability; authority, independence, billing opportunities and constraints; and intra-organizational coordination
|
Medical records |
|
|
Herbs and supplements |
|
Existence of sufficient evidence for patient recommendation and/or approval for inclusion in hospital formulary
Potential for real or perceived conflict of interest on part of health care providers for direct sales
Potential for revenue stream for clinic
|
Scope of practice |
|
|
Nature of CAM provider employment status |
|
Implications in a number of areas, including nature of payment and overhead, liability, access to electronic medical records, and professional practice obligations
|
Initial business plan and model for sustainability |
Deliverables and timelines for review by stakeholders
Acceptance of third-party coverage vs concierge practice and/or hybrid models
Need for ongoing philanthropic contributions and/or institutional subsidization
|
|