Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 16;5:2020. Originally published 2016 Aug 17. [Version 2] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.9419.2

Table 1. Comparison between both sampling protocols showing that MSTS outperforms RS.

Histological parameters MSTS RS p value
2 test)
High grade (G3/4) 31 21 0.0136
Granular eosinophilic cells 32 22 0.0114
Sarcomatoid phenotype 12 6 0.1
Tumor necrosis 10 7 0.5

[[i] MSTS: Multi-site tumor sampling, RS: Routine sampling]