Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Obes (Lond). 2013 Apr 8;37(7):900–906. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2013.49

Table 3. Association between mode of delivery and body mass outcome (Overweight/obese).

All children; children of normal weight mothers; children of overweight/obese mothers.

Body mass outcome Time period All children Children of normal weight mothers (BMI < 25) Children of overweight/obese mothers (BMI ≥ 25)
Mode of delivery Mode of delivery Mode of delivery
Caesarean Vaginal Caesarean Vaginal Caesarean Vaginal
Child 38 months 1.29 (0.92,1.80) 1.00 (ref) 1.02 (0.68,1.54) 1.00 (ref) 2.13 (1.09,4.18)* 1.00 (ref)
Overweight/obese (z-BMI ≥1.04) 7 years 1.77 (1.20,2.62)** 1.36 (0.82,2.25) 2.62 (1.27,5.41)**
9 years 1.49 (1.01,2.20)* 1.27 (0.77,2.10) 1.62 (0.78,3.37)
11 years 1.83 (1.24,2.70)** 1.44 (0.87,2.36) 2.11 (1.01,4.39)*
15 years 1.11 (0.70,1.78) 0.69 (0.36,1.32) 1.92 (0.84,4.38)
*

= p < .05;

**

= p < .10

Odds ratios are derived from multivariable mixed effects models with subject-level random effects, using logistic regression. Models were run for the outcome “child is overweight/obese”, within each of the three groups (all, children of normal weight mothers, and children of overweight/obese mothers). Models for all children include birth weight, sex, and the variables listed in Table 1, with maternal pre-pregnancy BMI z-score in deciles. Models for the two subgroups include the same variables, with maternal BMI z-score decile assigned within the subgroup.