Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 9;7(16):22523–22530. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8000

Table 2. Tumor characteristic, dose, and dose coverage analysis of five patients.

Patient No location size (cm) Amplitude (cm) regimine D99(cGy) D95(cGy) D1(cGy) V100(%)
ITV GTV_4D ITV GTV_4D ITV GTV_4D ITV GTV_4D
1 RL 2.5 1.2 50Gy/5f 4694(89.3%) 5258 5048(92.8%) 5440 6665(100.1%) 6657 95.88%(−3.96%) 99.84%
2 RL 1.8 0.7 50Gy/4f 4795(93.7%) 5115 4980(95.3%) 5223 5870(100.5%) 5842 93.75%(−6.12%) 99.87%
3 LU 2.9 0.1 50Gy/4f 4738(98.8%) 4794 4936(99.3%) 4972 5950(100.0%) 5948 93.36%(−0.87%) 94.23%
4 RU 2.3 0.1 50Gy/5f 4787(99.4%) 4814 4949(99.2%) 4991 5604(100.0%) 5601 93.00%(−1.00) 94.00%
5 LL 1.8 0.9 50Gy/4f 4846(96.2%) 5037 4920(94.6%) 5200 6343(99.9%) 6348 92.99%(−6.59%) 99.58%

For location column, RL is right left lobe, LU is left upper lobe, RU is right upper lobe, and LL is left lower lobe.

For D99, D95, and D1 in ITV column, it both listed the absolute dose and the relative dose (in the brackets). The relative dose was the absolute dose of ITV relative to the absolute dose of GTV_4D (real target). For V100 in ITV column, the brackets listed the V100 difference (V100_ITV-V100_GTV_4D).