Table 2.

Results from the Monoexponential and Biexponential Fits for Metabolites, MM, and Water Obtained under the Different TE/TM Combinations for Δ = 254.2 ms^a

			Results from fit
	Δ=254.2 ms		Monoexponential	Biexponential
	TE	TM	ADC	ADCfast	ADCslow	fslow
NAA	33.4	250	0.077 ± 0.003	0.202 ± 0.027	0.018 ± 0.002	0.59 ± 0.04
	73.4	210	0.073 ± 0.004	0.202 ± 0.045	0.019 ± 0.005	0.61 ± 0.09
	73.4	250	0.076 ± 0.006	0.164 ± 0.019	0.016 ± 0.002	0.52 ± 0.02
tCr	33.4	250	0.083 ± 0.012	0.172 ± 0.044	0.022 ± 0.005	0.50 ± 0.08
	73.4	210	0.081 ± 0.007	0.213 ± 0.028	0.027 ± 0.004	0.63 ± 0.07
	73.4	250	0.089 ± 0.001	0.191 ± 0.029	0.020 ± 0.004	0.51 ± 0.06
tCho	33.4	250	0.063 ± 0.003	0.171 ± 0.046	0.025 ± 0.008	0.66 ± 0.12
	73.4	210	0.057 ± 0.011	0.168 ± 0.059	0.025 ± 0.008	0.70 ± 0.13
	73.4	250	0.062 ± 0.014	0.154 ± 0.067	0.017 ± 0.013	0.53 ± 0.22
Ins	33.4	250	0.063 ± 0.012	0.125 ± 0.051	0.013 ± 0.015	0.43 ± 0.20
	73.4	210	0.066 ± 0.018	0.111 ± 0.047	0.009 ± 0.009	0.34 ± 0.16
	73.4	250	0.081 ± 0.006	0.385 ± 0.333	0.024 ± 0.014	0.67 ± 0.17
Tau	33.4	250	0.101 ± 0.003	0.190 ± 0.030	0.018 ± 0.009	0.43 ± 0.09
	73.4	210	0.097 ± 0.005	0.222 ± 0.065	0.019 ± 0.014	0.49 ± 0.15
	73.4	250	0.122 ± 0.026	0.302 ± 0.068	0.025 ± 0.004	0.56 ± 0.04
MM	33.4	250	0.009 ± 0.003	0.291 ± 0.308	0.003 ± 0.002	0.90 ± 0.12
	73.4	210	0.012 ± 0.008	0.065 ± 0.117	0.006 ± 0.003	0.97 ± 0.04
	73.4	250	0.013 ± 0.014	0.122 ± 0.097	0.003 ± 0.003	0.89 ± 0.14
Water	33.4	250	0.453 ± 0.010****	0.523 ± 0.019****†	0.053 ± 0.006	0.059 ± 0.004
	73.4	210	0.529 ± 0.005****	0.637 ± 0.019****†	0.054 ± 0.008	0.055 ± 0.007
	73.4	250	0.520 ± 0.012****	0.603 ± 0.020****†	0.051 ± 0.005	0.051 ± 0.004

^aUnits in the table are ms and µm²/ms. Asterisks indicate significant difference for different TE values: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.005, ****P < 0.001. Daggers indicate significant difference for different TM values: † P < 0.05. Statistical differences were evaluated using a one‐way ANOVA test followed by post hoc analysis.