Table 5.
Vibrio QDs-Ind | Daphnia QDs-Ind | Comet QDs-Ind | Vibrio QDs | Daphnia QDs | Comet QDs | Comet Ind | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vibrio | 0.93 | 0.85 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.82 | 0.85 | |
Qds-Ind | |||||||
Daphnia | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.98 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.94 | |
QDs-Ind | |||||||
Comet | 0.85 | 0.93 | 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.99 | 1.00 | |
QDs-Ind | |||||||
Vibrio | 0.94 | 0.98 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.92 | |
QDs | |||||||
Daphnia | 0.94 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.87 | 0.89 | |
QDs | |||||||
Comet | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 1.00 | |
QDs | |||||||
Comet | 0.85 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.89 | 1.00 | |
Ind |
Notes: In the table, R values derived from Pearson’s correlation are reported. In bold are values with P<0.01 and in italic are values with P<0.05.
Abbreviations: QDs, quantum dots; QDS-Ind, quantum dots-indolicidin.