Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 1;11(9):e0161753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161753

Table 4. Comparisons of peak neutralizing and binding antibody response rates by treatment group (Fisher's exact test).*.

Virus or Antigen Vaccine regimen P‐value
M/M/P/P M/M/P/P M/M/P/P MP/MP MP/MP D/D/M/M
MP/MP D/D/M/M D/D/MP/MP D/D/M/M D/D/MP/MP D/D/MP/MP
(T1 vs T2) (T1 vs T3) (T1 vs T4) (T2 vs T3) (T2 vs T4) (T3 vs T4)
Neutralizing
Tier 1 (Clade C)
MW965.26 0.40 <0.001 0.12 <0.001 0.49 <0.001
Tier 1 (Clade B)
MN.3 <0.001 <0.001 0.0004 0.01 0.79 0.003
SF162.LS 0.002 <0.001 0.21 0.33 0.33 0.02
Tier 2 (Clade C)
Du151.2 1.00 NA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
TV1.21 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Binding
1086 gp120) (C) 1.00 <0.001 0.05 <0.001 0.16 <0.001
Con 6 gp120/BC 1.00 <0.001 0.05 <0.001 0.16 <0.001
Con S gp140 CFI 1.00 <0.001 0.25 <0.001 0.25 0.01
o‐gpTV1ΔV2 © 1.00 <0.001 0.60 <0.001 1.00 <0.001

*2-sided P-values are Holm-Bonferroni adjusted (across the 6 pairs of treatment arm comparisons) for each antigen. M/M/P/P: MVA prime, sequential gp140 boost; MP/MP: concurrent MVA/gp140; D/D/M/M: DNA prime, sequential MVA boost; D/D/MP/MP: DNA prime, concurrent MVA/gp140 boost).