Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 1;11(9):e0162128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162128

Table 8. Performance of the algorithm for whooping sound detection using test data.

Case Diag Whoop TP TN FP FN Sen (%) Spe (%) PPV(%) NPV(%)
1 P Y 1 528 0 0 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
2 P Y 15 234 2 0 100.00 99.15 88.24 100.00
3 P N 0 99 0 0 - 100.00 - 100.00
4 P Y 1 113 0 2 33.33 100.00 100.00 98.26
5 P Y 4 165 0 0 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
6 P Y 1 565 0 1 50.00 100.00 100.00 99.82
7 P Y 0 640 0 5 0.00 100.00 - 99.22
8 P Y 0 229 0 1 0.00 100.00 - 99.57
9 P Y 5 127 2 1 83.33 98.45 71.43 99.22
10 P N 0 82 0 0 - 100.00 - 100.00
11 NP N 0 364 0 0 - 100.00 - 100.00
12 NP N 0 387 0 0 - 100.00 - 100.00
13 NP N 0 95 0 0 - 100.00 - 100.00
14 NP N 0 265 0 0 - 100.00 - 100.00
15 NP N 0 102 0 0 - 100.00 - 100.00
16 NP N 0 332 0 0 - 100.00 - 100.00
17 NP N 0 248 0 0 - 100.00 - 100.00
18 NP N 0 75 0 0 - 100.00 - 100.00
19 NP N 0 207 0 0 - 100.00 - 100.00
20 NP N 0 275 0 0 - 100.00 - 100.00
21 NP N 0 95 0 0 - 100.00 - 100.00
Total 27 5227 4 10 72.97 99.92 87.10 99.81

Diag—indicates whether recording has pertussis (P) or non-pertussis (NP) diagnosis. Whoop—indicates whether recording has whooping sound; Y—Yes; N- No. TP—true positives; TN—true negatives; FP—false positives; FN—false negatives. Sen—sensitivity; Spe—specificity; PPV—positive predictive value; NPV—negative predictive value.