Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 1;11(9):e0159902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159902

Table 7. Different experimental designs and their parameter correlation for MSS and the benchmark.

Corr(FIBench,MSS) CorrBench,emp FIMSS FIemp
5 (0.5, 0.56, 0.62) (0.84, 0.80, 0.87) (0.78, 0.8, 0.89) (0.85, 0.88, 0.87)
10 (0.46, 0.52, 0.53) (0.68, 0.62, 0.52) (0.61, 0.65, 0.64) (0.61, 0.74, 0.66)
20 (0.04, 0.17, 0.17) (0.67, 0.54, 0.54) (0.54, 0.53, 0.55) (0.64, 0.66, 0.66)
30 (0.27, -0.77, 0.) (0.76, 0.82, 0.79) (0.55, 0.52, 0.54) (0.55, 0.5, 0.58)
40 (-0.19, 0.55, -0.09) (0.75, 0.82, 0.77) (0.54, 0.52, 0.54) (0.6, 0.5, 0.63)

First column: number of observations with Deltat = 1, second column: correlation from FIBench, third column: correlation from estimates CorrBench,emp, fourth column: correlation from FIMSS and fifth column FIemp. The three numbers in brackets correspond to corr(θ1, θ2), corr(θ1, θ3), corr(θ2, θ3).