Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 6;188(12):867–875. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.151003

Table 3:

Participants with clinically important changes in outcomes, by follow-up time*

Outcome No. (%) of participants p§
Treatment group (electroacupuncture with nocturnal splinting)
n = 90
Control group (nocturnal splinting only)
n = 91
BCTQ score
SSS
 Week 1 11 (12.2) 19 (20.9) 0.1
 Week 2 19 (21.1) 23 (25.3) 0.5
 Week 5 33 (37.9) 27 (30.0) 0.3
 Week 17 40 (47.1) 32 (36.0) 0.1
FSS
 Week 1 7 (7.8) 17 (18.7) 0.03
 Week 2 15 (16.7) 15 (16.5) 1.0
 Week 5 19 (21.8) 18 (20.0) 0.8
 Week 17 30 (35.3) 21 (23.6) 0.09
DASH score
Week 1 7 (7.8) 16 (17.6) 0.05
Week 2 17 (18.9) 19 (20.9) 0.7
Week 5 24 (27.6) 21 (23.3) 0.5
Week 17 40 (47.1) 26 (29.2) 0.02
Pain intensity
Week 1 18 (20.0) 20 (22.0) 0.7
Week 2 21 (23.3) 24 (26.4) 0.6
Week 5 27 (31.0) 28 (31.1) 1.0
Week 17 34 (40.0) 31 (34.8) 0.5
Blinded DMMPUT completion time
Week 17 32 (37.6) 17 (19.1) < 0.01
Tip pinch strength
Week 17 39 (45.9) 32 (36.0) 0.2

Note: BCTQ = Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, DASH = Disability of Hand and Shoulder Questionnaire, DMMPUT = Dellon-modified Moberg pick-up test, FSS = Functional Status Scale.

*

Threshold for a minimally important difference is defined as a half of the baseline SD for SSS, FSS, DASH and DMMPUT, 1.66 lb for tip pinch strength, and 2 for pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale.

Particpants left trial (n = 87 for the treatment group, n = 90 for the control group).

Particpants left trial (n = 85 for the treatment group, n = 89 for the control group).

§

Two-sided p values for comparing proportions of patients showing clinically important changes between groups.