Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 6;188(12):E281–E288. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.151528

Table 3:

Demographic characteristics, laboratory site and cytology outcome, by vaccination dose

Characteristic No. (%) screened women
0 doses
n = 5712
1 dose
n = 327
2 doses
n = 490
≥ 3 doses
n = 3675
Age, yr*
 18 120 (2.1) 12 (3.7) 25 (5.1) 356 (9.7)
 19 478 (8.4) 61 (18.7) 138 (28.2) 1289 (35.1)
 20 2065 (36.2) 128 (39.1) 186 (38.0) 1515 (41.2)
 21 3049 (53.4) 126 (38.5) 141 (28.8) 515 (14.0)
Neighbourhood income quintile
 1 (lowest) 1115 (19.5) 66 (20.2) 93 (19.0) 607 (16.5)
 2 1170 (20.5) 60 (18.3) 100 (20.4) 763 (20.8)
 3 1044 (18.3) 57 (17.4) 81 (16.5) 667 (18.2)
 4 1201 (21.0) 74 (22.6) 115 (23.5) 772 (21.0)
 5 (highest) 1164 (20.4) 68 (20.8) 100 (20.4) 857 (23.3)
 Missing 18 (0.3) 2 (0.6) 1 (0.2) 9 (0.2)
Residential address
 Rural 1592 (27.9) 81 (24.8) 116 (23.7) 1084 (29.5)
 Urban 4102 (71.8) 244 (74.6) 373 (76.1) 2582 (70.3)
 Missing 18 (0.3) 2 (0.6) 1 (0.2) 9 (0.2)
Laboratory services
 Laboratory 1 2143 (37.5) 146 (44.6) 201 (41.0) 1457 (39.6)
 Laboratory 2 3569 (62.5) 181 (55.4) 289 (59.0) 2218 (60.4)
Cytology outcome (worst result)§
 Negative 4794 (83.9) 280 (85.6) 407 (83.1) 3242 (88.2)
 Abnormal 918 (16.1) 47 (14.4) 83 (16.9) 433 (11.8)
 Low grade** 846 (14.8) 45 (13.8) 82 (16.7) 411 (11.2)
 High grade†† 72 (1.3) 2 (0.6) 1 (0.2) 22 (0.6)
*

Age when Pap test (worst result between Jan. 1, 2012, and Aug. 14, 2015) was performed.

Laboratory in Calgary.

Laboratory in Edmonton.

§

Cytology with the worst result between Jan. 1, 2012, and Aug. 14, 2015.

Abnormal: both low-grade and high-grade abnormalities.

**

Low-grade cases: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.

††

High-grade cases: atypical squamous cells, cannot rule out a high-grade lesion; or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.