Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016 Aug 4;40(9):1991–2000. doi: 10.1111/acer.13162

Table 2.

Change in drinking over time, weeks 0 – 8, intention to treat sample (N = 68)

Treatment condition
ndf = 2
Week by condition
ndf = 2
Treatment week
ndf = 1
Contrast 1 by Week
ndf = 1
Contrast 2 by Week
ndf = 1
F ddf p F ddf p F ddf p t ddf p d* t ddf p d*
All data collected (observations = 606)
PDA 2.14 87.62 .12 5.93 535.93 <.01 10.28 535.95 <.01 −0.50 535.08 .62 .13 2.68 536.36 .01 .71
PHDD 0.28 91.52 .75 2.36 536.21 .10 0.24 536.24 .62 1.25 535.23 .21 .01 −0.89 536.72 .37 .64

Excluding data collected after withdrawal or last treatment contact (observations = 464)
PDA 2.14 76.23 .12 8.46 404.04 <.01 38.32 404.52 <.01 −0.10 405.27 .92 .03 3.28 406.90 .00 .94
PHDD 0.47 78.18 .62 3.24 405.38 .04 11.58 405.94 <.01 0.05 406.85 .96 .01 −2.04 408.59 .04 .64

Note: PDA = Percentage of Days Abstinent; PHDD = Percentage of Heavy Drinking Days; Contrast 1 indicates effect for TAU versus CBT4CBT+monitoring; Contrast 2 indicates effect for TAU versus TAU+CBT4CBT;

*

Effect size for growth model analysis (Feingold, 2009)