Table 2.
Piecewise Trajectories of Past 2-Week 10+ High-Intensity and 5+ Binge Drinking among U.S. Young Adults: Unconditional Growth Models Grouped by Gender and College Attendance
N | Mean estimates (unstandardized): | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I (Age 18) | S1 (Age 18–21/22) | S2 (Age 21/22–25/26) | |||||
Est | p | Est | p | Est | p | ||
| |||||||
10+ High-intensity drinking | |||||||
Two-group model: gendera | |||||||
Females | 2,153 | 0.089 | <.001 | 0.022 | 0.014 | −0.026 | 0.001 |
Males | 1,563 | 0.266 | <.001 | 0.068 | <.001 | −0.026 | 0.001 |
Two-group model: college attendance b | |||||||
Non-attendingc | 1,593 | 0.171 | <.001 | 0.016 | 0.254 | 0.002 | 0.871 |
Attending | 1,434 | 0.134 | <.001 | 0.088 | <.001 | −0.075 | <.001 |
Four-group model: gender and college attendanced | |||||||
Not attending - Females | 910 | 0.083 | <.001 | 0.010 | 0.389 | 0.007 | 0.578 |
Not attending - Males | 683 | 0.279 | <.001 | 0.010 | 0.389 | 0.007 | 0.578 |
Attending - Females | 896 | 0.042 | <.001 | 0.069 | <.001 | −0.058 | <.001 |
Attending - Males | 538 | 0.283 | <.001 | 0.069 | <.001 | −0.058 | <.001 |
5+ Binge drinking | |||||||
Two-group model: gendere | |||||||
Females | 2,146 | 0.275 | <.001 | 0.105 | <.001 | −0.035 | 0.015 |
Males | 1,554 | 0.509 | <.001 | 0.207 | <.001 | −0.035 | 0.015 |
Two-group model: college attendancef | |||||||
Non-attending | 1,589 | 0.401 | <.001 | 0.080 | <.001 | 0.006 | 0.802 |
Attending | 1,427 | 0.308 | <.001 | 0.254 | <.001 | −0.092 | <.001 |
Four-group model: gender and college attendanceg | |||||||
Not attending - Females | 907 | 0.296 | <.001 | 0.040 | 0.084 | <.001 | 0.987 |
Not attending - Males | 682 | 0.497 | <.001 | 0.142 | <.001 | <.001 | 0.987 |
Attending - Females | 893 | 0.202 | <.001 | 0.213 | <.001 | −0.091 | <.001 |
Attending - Males | 534 | 0.443 | <.001 | 0.323 | <.001 | −0.091 | <.001 |
Notes: I = Intercept; S1 = Slope 1; S2 = Slope 2. Decisions to free or constrain estimates to be equal across groups based on results of Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-square difference tests. For 10+ and 5+ gender grouping models, Slope 2 mean and variance were constrained to be equal across gender. For 10+ and 5+ college status grouping models, Slope 2 variance was constrained to be equal across college status. For the four-group gender and college status models, Slope 1 and Slope 2 means were constrained to be equal across gender within college status groups for 10+; Slope 2 mean was constrained to be equal across gender within college status groups for 5+.
χ2(df)=8.454(12); RMSEA=<.001; CFI=1.000; TLI=1.026.
χ2(df)=12.063(10); RMSEA=0.012; CFI=0.992; TLI=0.984.
Attending = Full-time student at 4-year college at age 19/20.
χ2(df)=32.264(30); RMSEA=0.010; CFI=0.991; TLI=0.988.
χ2(df)=20.926(14); RMSEA=0.016; CFI=0.989; TLI=0.985.
χ2(df)=26.255(11); RMSEA=0.030; CFI=0.977; TLI=0.959.
χ2(df)=44.440(28); RMSEA=0.028; CFI=0.975; TLI=0.964.