Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016 Aug 4;40(9):1905–1912. doi: 10.1111/acer.13164

Table 2.

Piecewise Trajectories of Past 2-Week 10+ High-Intensity and 5+ Binge Drinking among U.S. Young Adults: Unconditional Growth Models Grouped by Gender and College Attendance

N Mean estimates (unstandardized):
I (Age 18) S1 (Age 18–21/22) S2 (Age 21/22–25/26)
Est p Est p Est p

10+ High-intensity drinking
Two-group model: gendera
 Females 2,153 0.089 <.001 0.022 0.014 −0.026 0.001
 Males 1,563 0.266 <.001 0.068 <.001 −0.026 0.001
Two-group model: college attendance b
 Non-attendingc 1,593 0.171 <.001 0.016 0.254 0.002 0.871
 Attending 1,434 0.134 <.001 0.088 <.001 −0.075 <.001
Four-group model: gender and college attendanced
 Not attending - Females 910 0.083 <.001 0.010 0.389 0.007 0.578
 Not attending - Males 683 0.279 <.001 0.010 0.389 0.007 0.578
 Attending - Females 896 0.042 <.001 0.069 <.001 −0.058 <.001
 Attending - Males 538 0.283 <.001 0.069 <.001 −0.058 <.001
5+ Binge drinking
Two-group model: gendere
 Females 2,146 0.275 <.001 0.105 <.001 −0.035 0.015
 Males 1,554 0.509 <.001 0.207 <.001 −0.035 0.015
Two-group model: college attendancef
 Non-attending 1,589 0.401 <.001 0.080 <.001 0.006 0.802
 Attending 1,427 0.308 <.001 0.254 <.001 −0.092 <.001
Four-group model: gender and college attendanceg
 Not attending - Females 907 0.296 <.001 0.040 0.084 <.001 0.987
 Not attending - Males 682 0.497 <.001 0.142 <.001 <.001 0.987
 Attending - Females 893 0.202 <.001 0.213 <.001 −0.091 <.001
 Attending - Males 534 0.443 <.001 0.323 <.001 −0.091 <.001

Notes: I = Intercept; S1 = Slope 1; S2 = Slope 2. Decisions to free or constrain estimates to be equal across groups based on results of Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-square difference tests. For 10+ and 5+ gender grouping models, Slope 2 mean and variance were constrained to be equal across gender. For 10+ and 5+ college status grouping models, Slope 2 variance was constrained to be equal across college status. For the four-group gender and college status models, Slope 1 and Slope 2 means were constrained to be equal across gender within college status groups for 10+; Slope 2 mean was constrained to be equal across gender within college status groups for 5+.

a

χ2(df)=8.454(12); RMSEA=<.001; CFI=1.000; TLI=1.026.

b

χ2(df)=12.063(10); RMSEA=0.012; CFI=0.992; TLI=0.984.

c

Attending = Full-time student at 4-year college at age 19/20.

d

χ2(df)=32.264(30); RMSEA=0.010; CFI=0.991; TLI=0.988.

e

χ2(df)=20.926(14); RMSEA=0.016; CFI=0.989; TLI=0.985.

f

χ2(df)=26.255(11); RMSEA=0.030; CFI=0.977; TLI=0.959.

g

χ2(df)=44.440(28); RMSEA=0.028; CFI=0.975; TLI=0.964.