Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 2;7(5):744–750. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12482

Table 3.

Measures of glycemic control in the linagliptin and placebo groups at 12 weeks in Japanese patients, and 24 weeks in Asian (non‐Japanese) and white patients (full analysis set; last observation carried forward)

Study 1 Study 2
Japanese* 12 weeks Asian 24 weeks White 24 weeks
Linagliptin Placebo Linagliptin Placebo Linagliptin Placebo
HbA1c (%)
Patients (n) 159 80 155 72 178 90
Change from baseline (adjusted mean ± SE) −0.24 ± 0.06 0.63 ± 0.08 −0.45 ± 0.07 0.46 ± 0.10 −0.42 ± 0.06 0.10 ± 0.09
Difference vs placebo (adjusted mean ± SE) −0.87 ± 0.09 −0.91 ± 0.12 −0.52 ± 0.11
P‐value <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
FPG (mg/dL)
Patients (n) 159 80 155 70 163 78
Change from baseline (adjusted mean ± SE) −12.3 ± 1.9 7.4 ± 2.5 −10.9 ± 12.1 12.8 ± 12.5 7.5 ± 12.1 30.8 ± 12.0
Difference vs placebo (adjusted mean ± SE) −19.7 ± 2.9 −23.7 ± 5.1 −23.3 ± 4.9
P‐value <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001

*Previously reported by Kawamori et al.12 In study 1, the model includes treatment, baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and number of prior oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs); in study 2, the model includes baseline HbA1c, number of prior OADs, race, treatment group and treatment × race interaction. In study 1, the model includes treatment, baseline fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and number of prior OADs; in study 2, the model includes baseline HbA1c, baseline FPG, number of prior OADs, race, treatment group and treatment × race interaction. SE, standard error.