Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Homosex. 2016 Mar 7;63(8):1146–1160. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2016.1150056

Table 3.

Results of Linear Regressions with Statistical Interactions Modeling Depressive Symptomatology (CESD-SF) among EXPLORE Study Participants

Regression coefficient
(Standard error)

Model R.1 Model R.2 Model R.3 Model R.4
Employment status
Employed part-time 1.7*
(0.76)
0.5
(0.45)
0.04
(0.24)
1.8*
(0.86)
Unemployed/Other 1.0*
(0.51)
0.1
(0.35)
0.8***
(0.21)
0.6
(0.57)
Employed full-time 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

Income level
Less than $11,999 2.4***
(0.42)
2.2***
(0.28)
2.5***
(0.55)
2.5***
(0.56)
$12,000–29,999 1.3***
(0.22)
1.2***
(0.21)
0.9**
(0.36)
1.4***
(0.37)
$30,000–59,999 0.8***
(0.19)
0.7***
(0.18)
0.7*
(0.27)
0.7**
(0.28)
$60,000 or More 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

Educational attainment
High school or less 0.9***
(0.26)
1.1***
(0.31)
1.0
(0.89)
1.0*
(0.42)
Some college 0.6***
(0.19)
0.5*
(0.22)
0.9*
(0.45)
0.6
(0.46)
College degree 0.3
(0.16)
0.3
(0.18)
0.2
(0.30)
0.1
(0.30)
Post college 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

Interaction terms (p-values for omnibus tests)

Employment*Income…… p<0.01 …………… …………… p=0.01
Employment*Education… …………․ p=0.08 …………… p=0.31
Income*Education……… …………․ …………… p=0.92 p=0.97

Root MSE 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1
Model F-test
(df1, df2)
12.5
(26, 4200)
12.1
(26, 4200)
10.6
(29, 4197)
8.6
(39, 4187)

Notes. All models adjust for age group, race/ethnicity, history of sexual abuse, geographic site

***

p < .001,

**

p < .01,

*

p < .05