Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 2;9(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13045-016-0314-x

Table 3.

PS-weighted Cox analysis of transplant outcomes, adjusted for kind of conditioning and stem cell source

Type of transplant NRM RI LFS OS
HR 95 % CI p HR 95 % CI p HR 95 % CI p HR 95 % CI p
Global population
 Auto-HSCT (reference) 1 1 1 1
 10/10 UD-HSCT 3.1 2–4.7 <10−5 0.5 0.4–0.7 <10−5 0.7 0.6–0.9 0.0016 0.97 0.8–1.2 0.84
 9/10 UD-HSCT 4.5 2.5–8.1 <10−5 0.5 0.3–0.8 0.0016 0.8 0.6–1.1 0.227 1.1 0.8–1.7 0.49
By cytogenetic risk
 Good risk
  Auto-HSCT (reference) 1 1 1 1
  10/10 UD-HSCT 1.9 0.7–5.5 0.24 0.5 0.3–0.9 0.018 0.7 0.4–1.1 0.1 1.1 0.6–2 0.7
 Intermediate risk
  Auto-HSCT (reference) 1 1
  10/10 UD-HSCT 3.6 2–6.4 <10−4 0.5 0.4–0.7 <10−5 0.7 0.6–0.9 0.01 0.98 0.7–1.3 0.9
  9/10 UD-HSCT 9.4 4.9–18 <10−5 0.4 0.3–0.8 0.004 1.1 0.7–1.6 0.7 1.6 1.001–2.5 0.049
 Intermediate wtFLT3
  Auto-HSCT (reference) 1 1 1 1
  10/10 UD-HSCT 2.8 0.8–9.8 0.11 0.5 0.29–0.98 0.04 0.6 0.4–1.1 0.10 0.95 0.53–1.7 0.88
 Poor risk
  Auto-HSCT (reference) 1 1 1 1
  10/10 UD-HSCT 6.3 2.3–17.4 0.0004 0.5 0.3–0.7 0.0003 0.7 2.3–17.4 0.0004 0.9 0.6–1.2 0.4
  9/10 UD-HSCT 11.7 4–34.7 <10−5 0.7 0.4–1 0.08 1.03 0.7–1.5 0.88 1.3 0.9–1.9 0.2

Legend: wtFLT3 wild-type FLT3