. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.

Published in final edited form as: Am J Health Behav. 2016 Jul;40(4):514–522. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.40.4.13

Table 3.

Multinomial Logistic Regression Analyses Examining Differences among Tobacco Usage Groups on Sociodemographic Factors (N = 5468)

	Single alternative product ^a OR (95% CI)	Two or more alternative products ^a OR (95% CI)	Cigarette only ^a OR (95% CI)	Cigarette + alternative product(s) ^a OR (95% CI)
Sex
Women	REF	REF	REF	REF
Men	1.52 (1.26 – 1.83)	1.81 (1.43 – 2.30)	1.47 (1.18 – 1.83)	2.31 1.97 – 2.70)

Age in Years	1.21 (1.11 – 1.32)	.98 (.0.87 – 1.12)	1.57 (1.44 – 1.73)	1.34 (1.25 – 1.45)

Race
White	REF	REF	REF	REF
Hispanic	.95 (0.76 – 1.18)	.98 (0.73 – 1.30)	1.02 (0.80 – 1.30)	.94 (0.78 – 1.13)
African-American	.75 (0.52 – 1.07)	.91 (0.59 – 1.41)	.44 (0.26 – 0.72)	.54 (0.38 – 0.75)
Asian	.69 (0.53 – 0.91)	.72 (0.51 – 1.03)	.45 (0.32 – 0.65)	.47 (0.37 – 0.61)
Other	1.06 (0.75 – 1.49)	.87 (0.54 – 1.42)	.60 (0.37 – 0.97)	1.04 (0.78 – 1.39)

Note.

= Reference group is current non-tobacco users. Tobacco usage groups based on current, or past 30-day, tobacco (cigarettes, smokeless tobacco/snus, cigars/cigarillos/little cigars, hookah) or e-cigarette use. Alternative products include all products, except cigarettes.