Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 2.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Res. 2015 Oct;142:542–548. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.08.005

Table 2.

Fish consumption and biomarker levels of nutrients among study participants, and among NHANES participants.

Median (IQR)
Anglers (This study) NHANES, non-Hispanic white men aged ≥50 yearsb
Fish and shellfish consumption (meals per year)
Total fish and shellfish 66.5 (47, 114) 50.4 (23.9, 96.8)
Total fish 54.5 (36, 93) 33.3 (16.9, 64.6)
  Fish from Great Lakes 7 (2, 24) --
  Fish from areas of concerna 0 (0, 3) --
  Other locally caught fish 12 (6, 36) --
  Fish from restaurant 10 (4, 20) --
  Fish from store 4.5 (0, 12) --
Total shellfish 9 (4, 18) 23.1 (12.2, 47.9)
  Shellfish from restaurant 4 (1, 6) --
  Shellfish from store 4 (1, 10) --
Nutrients
 Docosahexaenoic acid, mg/L (DHA; n=153) 57 (44, 74) 39.9 (30.9, 56.4)
 Docosapentaenoic acid, mg/L (DPA; n=153) 19 (15, 25) 14.2 (11.8, 18.2)
 Eicosapentaenoic acid, mg/L (EPA; n=153) 22 (13, 32) 14.2 (9.9, 20.4)
 Selenium, mg/L (n=153) 141.4 (132.8, 153.2) 199.9 (179.6, 218.8)
 Vitamin D, ng/mL (sum of 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3) 28.3 (23.1, 36.4) 24.0 (18.2, 29.2)
a

Areas of concern include: Menominee River, Fox River/Lower Green Bay, St. Louis River and Bay, Sheboygan River, Milwaukee Estuary (including the lower Milwaukee and inner harbor, Kinnickinnic, and Menomonee Rivers and harbor)

b

For NHANES participants, all results are adjusted for survey sampling and design. Fish and shellfish consumption values are taken from the 2011–2012 cycle; consumption was ascertained for the previous 30 days, thus yearly consumption was calculated by multiplying by (365.25/30). For nutrient levels, values are taken from the 2003–2004 (fatty acids), 2005–2006 (vitamin D) and 2011–2012 (selenium) cycles of the NHANES.