Table 3. Functional Disability Scores.
Study | Mean Baseline | Follow-up | % Improvement |
Studies reported ODI | |||
Baral (2011) [20] | 60.86 | 35.68 | 41 |
Kawu (2012) [19] | 61 | 32 | 48 |
Rados (2011) [22] | ~54 | ~40 | 26 |
Sayegh (2009) [25] | 38.5 | 8.95 | 77 |
Manchikanti (2014 A) [17] | 29.95 | 14.8 | 51 |
Manchikanti (2014 B) [12] | 28.95 | 14.5 | 50 |
Manchikanti (2011) [21] | 28.55 | 14.3 | 50 |
Manchikanti (2010) [23] | 29.35 | 14 | 52 |
Manchikanti (2008) [26] | 28.55 | 13.3 | 53 |
Studies reported RMDQ | |||
Helvoirt (2014) [16] | 12.2 | 3.3 | 73 |
Spijker-Huiges (2014) [2] | 16.5 | 2.3 | 86 |
Studies reported ICIDH by WHO | |||
Gomez (2007) [27] | Grade 3 (11.7%) | Grade 3 3.3% | NA |
Grade 2 (53.3%) | Grade 2 20% | ||
Grade 1 (35%) | Grade 1 26.7 | ||
Grade 0 (0%) | Grade 0 50% | ||
Studies reported JOA | |||
Yang (2006) [30] | 7.44 ±2.16 | 12.19 ± 2.23 |