Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Aug 19;25(9):1317–1325. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-1159

Table 2.

Correlates of parental agreement for HPV vaccine school-entry requirements (N=1,501).

No. respondents who
agreed with “I think
these laws are a
good idea” (%)
Bivariate OR
(95% CI)
Multivariable OR
(95% CI)
Household characteristics
Income
  <$35,000 79/329 (24) Ref -
  $35,000 – $74,999 95/467 (20) 0.81 (0.58, 1.13) -
  ≥$75,000 147/705 (21) 0.83 (0.61, 1.14) -
Region
  Northeast 65/261 (25) Ref Ref
  Midwest 60/392 (15) 0.54 (0.37, 0.81)** 0.64 (0.42, 0.98)*
  South 113/497 (23) 0.89 (0.63, 1.26) 0.92 (0.62, 1.36)
  West 83/351 (24) 0.93 (0.64, 1.36) 0.88 (0.58, 1.33)
Resident of state that requires HPV vaccination for school
attendance
  No 306/1,458 (21) Ref Ref
  Yes1 15/43 (35) 2.01 (1.06, 3.82)* 1.68 (0.81, 3.48)
Child characteristics
Sex
  Male 172/763 (23) Ref -
  Female 149/738 (20) 0.87 (0.68, 1.11) -
Age (years)
  11–12 93/420 (22) Ref -
  13–17 228/1081 (21) 0.94 (0.72, 1.23) -
HPV vaccination
  0 doses 107/807 (13) Ref Ref
  ≥1 dose 214/694 (31) 2.92 (2.25, 3.78)** 1.33 (0.95, 1.86)
Parents’ characteristics and attitudes about HPV vaccine
Sex
  Male 151/666 (23) Ref -
  Female 170/835 (20) 0.87 (0.68, 1.12) -
Race/Ethnicity
  Non-Hispanic White 198/1,056 (19) Ref Ref
  Non-Hispanic Black 31/134 (23) 1.30 (0.85, 2.01) 0.98 (0.61, 1.58)
  Hispanic 67/212 (32) 2.00 (1.44, 2.78)** 1.53 (1.05, 2.22)*
  Other 25/99 (25) 1.46 (0.91, 2.36) 1.16 (0.69, 1.98)
Education
  High school degree or less 125/574 (22) Ref -
  Some college 73/389 (19) 0.83 (0.60, 1.15) -
  Bachelor’s degree or higher 123/538 (23) 1.06 (0.80, 1.41) -
Psychological reactance
  Low 251/1,089 (23) Ref Ref
  High 70/412 (17) 0.68 (0.51, 0.92)* 0.99 (0.71, 1.37)
Has a doctor or other health care provider ever told your
child should get the HPV vaccine?
  No 114/721 (16) Ref Ref
  Yes 207/780 (27) 1.92 (1.49, 2.48)** 1.13 (0.82, 1.55)
Relative importance of HPV vaccine compared to Tdap
and meningococcal vaccines
  Less important 74/736 (10) Ref Ref
  As or more important 247/765 (32) 4.27 (3.21, 5.67)** 2.76 (1.98, 3.83)**
The HPV vaccine might cause lasting health problems.
  Disagree/neither 279/1,153 (24) Ref Ref
  Agree 42/348 (12) 0.43 (0.30, 0.61)** 0.71 (0.47, 1.08)
The HPV vaccine is being pushed to make money for
drug companies.
  Disagree/neither 270/1,022 (26) Ref Ref
  Agree 51/479 (11) 0.33 (0.24, 0.46)** 0.47 (0.32, 0.69)**
I don’t have enough information about the HPV vaccine
to decide whether to give it to my child.
  Disagree/neither 247/1,022 (24) Ref Ref
  Agree 74/479 (16) 0.57 (0.43, 0.76)** 1.14 (0.80, 1.62)
The HPV vaccine is effective in preventing cervical
cancer.
  Disagree/neither 117/900 (13) Ref Ref
  Agree 204/601 (34) 3.44 (2.66, 4.45)** 2.55 (1.93, 3.37)**
It would be hard to find a provider or clinic where I can
afford HPV vaccine for my child.
  Disagree/neither 290/1,419 (20) Ref Ref
  Agree 31/82 (38) 2.37 (1.49, 3.77)** 2.50 (1.45, 4.33)**

NOTE: HPV = Human papillomavirus; OR = Odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; Ref = Referent group. Dashes (−) indicate the variable was not included in the multivariable model because it was not statistically significant at the bivariate level.

1

Respondents from Virginia and Washington, DC. Rhode Island did not have a school-entry requirement at the time of data collection.

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01