Table 2.
Correlates of parental agreement for HPV vaccine school-entry requirements (N=1,501).
No. respondents who agreed with “I think these laws are a good idea” (%) |
Bivariate OR (95% CI) |
Multivariable OR (95% CI) |
|
---|---|---|---|
Household characteristics | |||
Income | |||
<$35,000 | 79/329 (24) | Ref | - |
$35,000 – $74,999 | 95/467 (20) | 0.81 (0.58, 1.13) | - |
≥$75,000 | 147/705 (21) | 0.83 (0.61, 1.14) | - |
Region | |||
Northeast | 65/261 (25) | Ref | Ref |
Midwest | 60/392 (15) | 0.54 (0.37, 0.81)** | 0.64 (0.42, 0.98)* |
South | 113/497 (23) | 0.89 (0.63, 1.26) | 0.92 (0.62, 1.36) |
West | 83/351 (24) | 0.93 (0.64, 1.36) | 0.88 (0.58, 1.33) |
Resident of state that requires HPV vaccination for school attendance |
|||
No | 306/1,458 (21) | Ref | Ref |
Yes1 | 15/43 (35) | 2.01 (1.06, 3.82)* | 1.68 (0.81, 3.48) |
Child characteristics | |||
Sex | |||
Male | 172/763 (23) | Ref | - |
Female | 149/738 (20) | 0.87 (0.68, 1.11) | - |
Age (years) | |||
11–12 | 93/420 (22) | Ref | - |
13–17 | 228/1081 (21) | 0.94 (0.72, 1.23) | - |
HPV vaccination | |||
0 doses | 107/807 (13) | Ref | Ref |
≥1 dose | 214/694 (31) | 2.92 (2.25, 3.78)** | 1.33 (0.95, 1.86) |
Parents’ characteristics and attitudes about HPV vaccine | |||
Sex | |||
Male | 151/666 (23) | Ref | - |
Female | 170/835 (20) | 0.87 (0.68, 1.12) | - |
Race/Ethnicity | |||
Non-Hispanic White | 198/1,056 (19) | Ref | Ref |
Non-Hispanic Black | 31/134 (23) | 1.30 (0.85, 2.01) | 0.98 (0.61, 1.58) |
Hispanic | 67/212 (32) | 2.00 (1.44, 2.78)** | 1.53 (1.05, 2.22)* |
Other | 25/99 (25) | 1.46 (0.91, 2.36) | 1.16 (0.69, 1.98) |
Education | |||
High school degree or less | 125/574 (22) | Ref | - |
Some college | 73/389 (19) | 0.83 (0.60, 1.15) | - |
Bachelor’s degree or higher | 123/538 (23) | 1.06 (0.80, 1.41) | - |
Psychological reactance | |||
Low | 251/1,089 (23) | Ref | Ref |
High | 70/412 (17) | 0.68 (0.51, 0.92)* | 0.99 (0.71, 1.37) |
Has a doctor or other health care provider ever told your child should get the HPV vaccine? |
|||
No | 114/721 (16) | Ref | Ref |
Yes | 207/780 (27) | 1.92 (1.49, 2.48)** | 1.13 (0.82, 1.55) |
Relative importance of HPV vaccine compared to Tdap and meningococcal vaccines |
|||
Less important | 74/736 (10) | Ref | Ref |
As or more important | 247/765 (32) | 4.27 (3.21, 5.67)** | 2.76 (1.98, 3.83)** |
The HPV vaccine might cause lasting health problems. | |||
Disagree/neither | 279/1,153 (24) | Ref | Ref |
Agree | 42/348 (12) | 0.43 (0.30, 0.61)** | 0.71 (0.47, 1.08) |
The HPV vaccine is being pushed to make money for drug companies. |
|||
Disagree/neither | 270/1,022 (26) | Ref | Ref |
Agree | 51/479 (11) | 0.33 (0.24, 0.46)** | 0.47 (0.32, 0.69)** |
I don’t have enough information about the HPV vaccine to decide whether to give it to my child. |
|||
Disagree/neither | 247/1,022 (24) | Ref | Ref |
Agree | 74/479 (16) | 0.57 (0.43, 0.76)** | 1.14 (0.80, 1.62) |
The HPV vaccine is effective in preventing cervical cancer. |
|||
Disagree/neither | 117/900 (13) | Ref | Ref |
Agree | 204/601 (34) | 3.44 (2.66, 4.45)** | 2.55 (1.93, 3.37)** |
It would be hard to find a provider or clinic where I can afford HPV vaccine for my child. |
|||
Disagree/neither | 290/1,419 (20) | Ref | Ref |
Agree | 31/82 (38) | 2.37 (1.49, 3.77)** | 2.50 (1.45, 4.33)** |
NOTE: HPV = Human papillomavirus; OR = Odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; Ref = Referent group. Dashes (−) indicate the variable was not included in the multivariable model because it was not statistically significant at the bivariate level.
Respondents from Virginia and Washington, DC. Rhode Island did not have a school-entry requirement at the time of data collection.
p < .05;
p < .01