Table 2. Point Estimates and Univariate Tests of Method of Administration Among MML Features (MML Status / Duration of MML / Dispensary Density).
| Ever Used Method | Preferred Method† | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smoke | Vape* | Edible* | Smoke* | Vape | Edible | |
| MML Status | ||||||
| No | 99.7% | 53.8% | 68.0% | 84.3% | 19.1% | 8.1% |
| Yes | 99.5% | 68.6% | 77.6% | 78.9% | 21.7% | 9.25% |
|
| ||||||
| Duration of MML | ||||||
| No MML | 99.7% | 53.8% | 68.0% | 84.3% | 19.1% | 8.1% |
| 0-5 years | 99.5% | 66.7% | 71.5% | 78.8% | 23.9% | 9.5% |
| 6-10 years | 100% | 62.9% | 82.3% | 84.6% | 17.3% | 5.6% |
| > 10 years | 99.4% | 72.9% | 86.1% | 77.7% | 19.5% | 9.8% |
|
| ||||||
| Dispensary (per 100k people) | ||||||
| No MML | 99.7% | 53.8% | 68.0% | 84.3% | 19.1% | 8.1% |
| 0 | 99.5% | 66.4% | 73.2% | 80.9% | 21.9% | 7.9% |
| < 1 | 100% | 68.1% | 77.3% | 75.7% | 23.9% | 13.8% |
| ≥ 1 | 99.4% | 72.3% | 84.9% | 76.5% | 21.0% | 10.0% |
Chi squared tests used to calculate p-values
*
All three comparisons (MML Status, Duration MML, and Dispensary) for that method were significant (p<0.01)
†
Among those who had ever used that method of administration