Table 4.
Analyte | Extraction efficiency (%, N=12) | Matrix effect (% of signal suppressed, N=12) | RT 21h (% difference, N=3) | 4°C 72h (% difference, N=3) | 3 freeze-thaw cycles (% difference, N=3) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | |
THCVCOOH | 81.5 | 73.6 | 9.2 | 9.1 | −1.7 | 2.0 | −1.3 | 3.1 | −6.7 | 0.0 |
THCCOOH-gluc | 63.4 | 57.9 | 0.3 | 10.2 | −20.3 | −20.3 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 3.7 | 3.1 |
THC-gluc | 72.0 | 67.6 | 32.0 | 32.5 | −15.4 | −4.1 | −3.0 | −1.5 | −0.1 | 0.0 |
THCCOOH | 73.9 | 69.4 | 0.0 | 9.0 | 1.3 | 5.1 | 6.2 | 2.8 | −1.3 | −1.1 |
THCAA | 42.4 | 42.5 | −10.0 | −6.0 | −55.4 | −57.1 | −15.8 | 5.2 | 3.7 | −7.7 |
11-OH-THC | 73.6 | 71.1 | 7.2 | 11.3 | −4.2 | −5.3 | −3.1 | 2.9 | 3.5 | −2.2 |
THCV | 68.9 | 65.8 | 1.9 | 9.0 | −52.7 | −41.8 | −14.9 | −2.5 | −10.6 | −10.1 |
CBD | 73.6 | 68.7 | 2.0 | 11.5 | −59.4 | −56.6 | −2.0 | −8.9 | 0.7 | −9.4 |
CBG | 69.5 | 66.9 | 1.4 | 6.5 | −62.6 | −62.7 | −9.3 | −14.7 | −10.1 | −14.7 |
CBN | 54.7 | 52.3 | 1.1 | 10.7 | −55.2 | −57.1 | −0.8 | −5.4 | −3.9 | −6.9 |
THC | 58.4 | 55.7 | 0.6 | 6.4 | −55.7 | −58.3 | −16.4 | −8.8 | −5.0 | −7.2 |