Table 3.
95 % CI | |||||||||
Hypothesis | Outcome | Parameter | β | SE | p value | Lower | Upper | ||
Effect of the intervention | Positive affect | Intercept | 4.27 | 0.15 | <0.001 | 3.97 | 4.57 | ||
Intervention | 0.91 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.48 | 1.33 | ||||
Negative affect | Intercept | 2.56 | 0.13 | <0.001 | 2.29 | 2.82 | |||
Intervention | −0.71 | 0.19 | <0.001 | −1.08 | −0.34 | ||||
Mindfulness | Intercept | 4.24 | 0.15 | <0.001 | 3.94 | 4.54 | |||
Intervention | 0.98 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 0.56 | 1.40 | ||||
Allowing | Intercept | 5.06 | 0.16 | <0.001 | 4.73 | 5.39 | |||
Intervention | 0.43 | 0.23 | 0.067 | −0.03 | 0.90 | ||||
Time-lagged analyses: effect of previous moment on following momentc | Positive affect | Intercept | 1.39 | 0.12 | <0.001 | 1.15 | 1.63 | ||
Previous mindfulness | 0.18 | 0.03 | <0.001 | 0.12 | 0.25 | ||||
Previous positive affect | 0.53 | 0.03 | <0.001 | 0.47 | 0.60 | ||||
Interaction termsa | NS | ||||||||
Negative affect | Intercept | 1.62 | 0.23 | <0.001 | 1.17 | 2.07 | |||
Intervention | 0.10 | 0.31 | NS | −0.52 | 0.71 | ||||
Previous mindfulness | −0.14 | 0.04 | <0.001 | −0.21 | −0.07 | ||||
Previous negative affect | 0.59 | 0.04 | <0.001 | 0.52 | 0.67 | ||||
Interaction termsb,d | −0.16 | 0.05 | 0.002 | −0.27 | −0.06 | ||||
Mindfulness | Intercept | 1.75 | 0.13 | <0.001 | 1.49 | 2.02 | |||
Previous mindfulness | 0.43 | 0.03 | <0.001 | 0.36 | 0.49 | ||||
Previous positive affect | 0.21 | 0.03 | <0.001 | 0.14 | 0.27 | ||||
Interaction termsa | NS | ||||||||
Mindfulness | Intercept | 2.91 | 0.21 | <0.001 | 2.50 | 3.31 | |||
Previous mindfulness | 0.48 | 0.03 | <0.001 | 0.42 | 0.54 | ||||
Previous negative affect | −0.19 | 0.03 | <0.001 | −0.25 | −0.12 | ||||
Interaction termsb | NS | ||||||||
Time-lagged analyses: effect of previous on following day | Positive affect | Intercept | 2.18 | 0.64 | 0.001 | 0.90 | 3.47 | ||
Mindfulness previous day | 0.23 | 0.17 | 0.192 | −0.12 | 0.58 | ||||
Positive affect previous day | 0.36 | 0.19 | 0.060 | −0.02 | 0.74 | ||||
Negative affect | Intercept | 1.74 | 0.91 | 0.063 | −0.10 | 3.58 | |||
Mindfulness previous day | −0.11 | 0.13 | 0.411 | −0.38 | 0.16 | ||||
Negative affect previous day | 0.38 | 0.15 | 0.012 | 0.09 | 0.68 | ||||
Mindfulness | Intercept | 3.50 | 0.53 | 0.005 | 1.91 | 5.09 | |||
Mindfulness previous day | 0.66 | 0.17 | 0.002 | 0.29 | 1.03 | ||||
Positive affect previous day | −0.36 | 0.12 | 0.027 | −0.65 | −0.06 | ||||
Mindfulness | Intercept | 0.86 | 1.10 | 0.435 | −1.30 | 3.02 | |||
Mindfulness previous day | 0.67 | 0.15 | <0.001 | 0.31 | 1.03 | ||||
Negative affect previous day | 0.41 | 0.13 | 0.002 | 0.15 | 0.67 | ||||
Effect of extra days walking | Positive affect | Intercept | 4.89 | 0.19 | <0.001 | 4.51 | 5.27 | ||
Day | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.011 | 0.03 | 0.20 | ||||
Negative affect | Intercept | 2.04 | 0.16 | <0.001 | 1.72 | 2.37 | |||
Day | −0.04 | 0.04 | 0.286 | −0.12 | 0.04 | ||||
Mindfulness | Intercept | 4.92 | 0.16 | <0.001 | 4.58 | 5.27 | |||
Day | 0.14 | 0.00 | <0.001 | 0.14 | 0.14 |
95 % CI 95 % confidence interval, SE standard error, NS not statistically significant
aInteraction terms positive affect: previous mindfulness × intervention, previous positive affect × intervention
bInteraction terms negative affect: previous mindfulness × intervention, previous negative affect × intervention
cInteraction with group condition was non-significant; therefore, data were collapsed across the control and intervention period
dInteraction term intervention × previous negative affect was significant; therefore, split file on condition was performed