Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 13;29(4):759–772. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00022-16

TABLE 3.

Summary of recent meta-analyses that focused on clinical studies of continuous infusion and prolonged infusion of beta-lactamsa

Reference Study design(s)/no. of studies Beta-lactam class(es) No. of patients analyzed for each outcome (mortality/clinical cure) Mortality (RR/95% CI) Clinical cure (RR/95% CI)
Tamma et al., 2011(93) RCT/14 Pcn, Ceph, Car 982/1,380 0.92/0.61–1.37 1.00/0.94–1.06
Falagas et al., 2013 (4) RCT/3; retrospective/8; prospective/3 Pcn, Car 1,116/557 0.59/0.41–0.83 1.13/0.99–1.28
Korbila et al., 2013 (97) RCT/10; retrospective/1 Ceph 914/496 0.96/0.8–1.15 1.14/0.94–1.37
Teo et al., 2014 (99) RCT/18; prospective/3; retrospective/8 Pcn, Ceph, Car 1,620/1,546 0.66/0.53–0.83 1.12/1.03–1.21
Yang et al., 2015 (100) RCT/5; prospective/2; retrospective/7 Pcn 1,591/718 0.67/0.5–0.89 1.88/1.29–2.73
Roberts et al. 2016 (102) RCT/3 Pcn, Car 632/632 0.74/0.56–1 1.2/1.03–1.4
a

Abbreviations: RCT, randomized controlled trial; Pcn, penicillin; Ceph, cephalosporin; Car, carbapenem; RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval.