Table 2.
Final summary of results of SPs and faculty evaluation on the six domains of the instrument
| Category | SP assessmenta | Category | Faculty assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context for discussion | 46 % outstanding | Context for discussion | 40 % outstanding |
| 33 % satisfactory | 57 % satisfactory | ||
| 20 % unsatisfactory | 3 % unsatisfactory | ||
| Honesty and Truthfulness | 63 % outstanding | Communication of detection of error | 41 % outstanding |
| 22 % satisfactory | 32 % satisfactory | ||
| 15 % unsatisfactory | 27 % unsatisfactory | ||
| Empathy | 56 % outstanding | Empathy | 77 % Outstanding |
| 39 % satisfactory | 32 % satisfactory | ||
| 5 % unsatisfactory | 1 % unsatisfactory | ||
| Closure | 43 % outstanding | Management of error | 62 % Outstanding |
| 44 % satisfactory | |||
| 23 % satisfactory | |||
| 13 % unsatisfactory | |||
| 15 % unsatisfactory | |||
| Global rating | 48 % outstanding | Use of EMR and EMIRb | 43 % Outstanding |
| 39 % satisfactory | 39 % satisfactory | ||
| 13 % unsatisfactory | 13 % unsatisfactory | ||
| Global ratingc | 29 % Outstanding | ||
| 46 % satisfactory | |||
| 25 % unsatisfactory |
a Data were not available for 3 trainees
bData were not available for 3 trainees
cData were not available for 1 trainee