Table 3.
Descriptive analysis of questionnaire’s question 4 and 8 for the pre- and post-event groups
| PRE - EVENT question 3 and question 7 | POST - EVENT question 3 and question 7 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUESTION 3 Satisfaction toward the tracking property of the Electronic Witness 1 = Not at all 2 = A little 3 = Moderately 4 = A lot 5 = Extremely 6 = No viewpoint |
Frequency (%) | Median ± IQR | QUESTION 3 Satisfaction toward the tracking property of the Electronic Witness 1 = Not at all 2 = A little 3 = Moderately 4 = A lot 5 = Extremely 6 = No viewpoint |
Frequency (%) | Median ± IQR |
| 1 | 2 (1.0) | 5 ± 1 | 1 | 6 (2.9) | 5 ± 1 |
| 2 | 5 (2.5) | 2 | 6 (2.9) | ||
| 3 | 22 (10.8) | 3 | 16 (7.8) | ||
| 4 | 61 (29.9) | 4 | 57 (27.9) | ||
| 5 | 113 (55.4) | 5 | 116 (56.9) | ||
| 6 | 1 (0.5) | 6 | 3 (1.5) | ||
| Total | 204 (100.0) | Total | 204 (100.0) | ||
| QUESTION 7 Satisfaction toward the IVF clinic using EWS 1 = Not at all 2 = A little 3 = Moderately 4 = A lot 5 = Extremely 6 = No viewpoint |
Frequency (%) | Median ± IQR | QUESTION 7 Satisfaction toward the IVF clinic using EWS 1 = Not at all 2 = A little 3 = Moderately 4 = A lot 5 = Extremely 6 = No viewpoint |
Frequency (%) | Median ± IQR |
| 1 | 0 (0) | 5 ± 1 | 1 | 2 (1.0) | 4 ± 1 |
| 2 | 2 (1.0) | 2 | 5 (2.5) | ||
| 3 | 28 (13.7) | 3 | 30 (14.7) | ||
| 4 | 58 (28.4) | 4 | 72 (35.3) | ||
| 5 | 113 (55.4) | 5 | 90 (44.1) | ||
| 6 | 3 (1.5) | 6 | 5 (2.5) | ||
| Total | 204 (100.0) | Total | 204 (100.0) | ||
IQR inter-quartile range