Table 3.
Stepwise regression analysis assessing which fitness components were independently associated with health-related quality of life in early postmenopausal women
β | B | SE | P | R 2 | R 2 change | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF-36 physical component summary | |||||||
Step 1 | 0.032 | 0.573 | |||||
Age | 0.145 | 0.742 | 0.649 | 0.258 | |||
Educational status | 0.126 | 3.040 | 3.200 | 0.345 | |||
Occupational status | −0.038 | −0.909 | 3.129 | 0.773 | |||
Step 2 | 0.290 | 0.258 | <0.001 | ||||
Age | 0.152 | 0.777 | 0.561 | 0.172 | |||
Educational status | −0.064 | −0.002 | 2.838 | 0.982 | |||
Occupational status | 0.004 | 0.096 | 2.711 | 0.972 | |||
Chair sit-and-reach | 0.523 | 0.988 | 0.212 | <0.001 | |||
Step 3 | 0.349 | 0.059 | <0.001 | ||||
Age | 0.151 | 0.773 | 0.542 | 0.159 | |||
Educational status | 0.001 | 0.027 | 2.741 | 0.992 | |||
Occupational status | −0.020 | −0.474 | 2.630 | 0.858 | |||
Chair sit-and-reach | 0.377 | 0.713 | 0.236 | 0.004 | |||
Handgrip strength | 0.283 | −13.313 | 0.598 | 0.025 | |||
SF-36 mental component summary | |||||||
Step 1 | 0.275 | 0.643 | |||||
Age | 0.108 | 0.480 | 0.480 | 0.401 | |||
Educational status | 0.129 | 2.704 | 2.794 | 0.337 | |||
Occupational status | −0.091 | 2.737 | −1.885 | 0.493 | |||
Step 2 | 0.194 | 0.167 | 0.011 | ||||
Age | 0.109 | 0.488 | 0.522 | 0.350 | |||
Educational status | 0.082 | 1.724 | 2.580 | 0.507 | |||
Occupational status | −0.109 | −2.254 | 2.514 | 0.374 | |||
Handgrip strength | 0.412 | 1.750 | 0.497 | 0.001 | |||
Step 3 | 0.266 | 0.072 | 0.002 | ||||
Age | 0.165 | 0.739 | 0.513 | 0.155 | |||
Educational status | −0.034 | −0.719 | 2.685 | 0.790 | |||
Occupational status | −0.059 | −1.216 | 2.459 | 0.623 | |||
Handgrip strength | 0.361 | 1.533 | 0.487 | 0.003 | |||
6-min walk | 0.304 | 0.125 | 0.052 | 0.020 |
SF-36 Short-Form Health Survey-36, SE standard error, CI confidence interval, β standardized regression coefficient, B nonstandardized regression coefficient, R 2 adjusted coefficient of determination, expressing the percent variability of the dependent variable explained by each model, R 2 change, additional percent variability explained by the model due to the inclusion of the new term