Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroinformatics. 2016 Oct;14(4):439–452. doi: 10.1007/s12021-016-9307-8

Table 4.

Comparison of regression performances on random selected SNP rs12410166 of the competing methods in terms of Correlation Coefficient (CC)

Method CC(mean±std)
train test
SM(VBM) −0.0394±0.0670 0.0224±0.0977
SM(FDG) 0.0633±0.0311 −0.0221±0.0650
SM(AV45) 0.0542±0.0349 0.0092±0.0643
DGSM(VBM) 0.0617±0.0442 −0.0113±0.0521
DGSM(FDG) 0.0821±0.0213 −0.0344±0.0370
DGSM(AV45) 0.0797±0.0883 −0.0126±0.0945
CM 0.0100±0.0205 0.0032±0.0918
DGCM 0.0698±0.0295 −0.0289±0.0881
MM(VBM) 0.3470±0.0192 0.0372±0.0328
MM(FDG) 0.3594±0.0104 0.0521±0.0585
MM(AV45) 0.3479±0.0190 0.0352±0.0417
DGMM(VBM) 0.1845±0.1161 0.0320±0.0652
DGMM(FDG) 0.2324±0.0917 −0.0071±0.0589
DGMM(AV45) 0.1808±0.1190 0.0338±0.0551