Table 4.
Comparison of regression performances on random selected SNP rs12410166 of the competing methods in terms of Correlation Coefficient (CC)
| Method | CC(mean±std) |
|
|---|---|---|
| train | test | |
| SM(VBM) | −0.0394±0.0670 | 0.0224±0.0977 |
| SM(FDG) | 0.0633±0.0311 | −0.0221±0.0650 |
| SM(AV45) | 0.0542±0.0349 | 0.0092±0.0643 |
| DGSM(VBM) | 0.0617±0.0442 | −0.0113±0.0521 |
| DGSM(FDG) | 0.0821±0.0213 | −0.0344±0.0370 |
| DGSM(AV45) | 0.0797±0.0883 | −0.0126±0.0945 |
| CM | 0.0100±0.0205 | 0.0032±0.0918 |
| DGCM | 0.0698±0.0295 | −0.0289±0.0881 |
| MM(VBM) | 0.3470±0.0192 | 0.0372±0.0328 |
| MM(FDG) | 0.3594±0.0104 | 0.0521±0.0585 |
| MM(AV45) | 0.3479±0.0190 | 0.0352±0.0417 |
| DGMM(VBM) | 0.1845±0.1161 | 0.0320±0.0652 |
| DGMM(FDG) | 0.2324±0.0917 | −0.0071±0.0589 |
| DGMM(AV45) | 0.1808±0.1190 | 0.0338±0.0551 |