Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 5;6:192. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00192

Table 1.

Incidence rates reported in the literature.

Reference Diagnostic method Duration of follow-up Subjects Incidence rates
Haid et al. (7) Self-report
Inter-limb circumference (tape) >2 cm
Clinical examination
ALND mean 25 months
SLNB mean 18 months
ALND 140
SLNB 57
ALND 27.1%
SLNB 3.5%
Veronesi et al. (8) Inter-limb circumference (tape) >2 cm 24 months ALND 100
SLNB 100
ALND 6 months 8%
24 months 12%
SLNB 6 months 0%
24 months 0%
Armer et al. (9) Inter-limb circumference (tape) >2 cm
Self-report
Mean 28 months 102 SLNB 22.2%
ALND 43.3%
Leidenius et al. (10) Self-report
Limb circumference
Clinical examination
36 months ALND 57
SLNB 92
ALND Clinical 13%
Self-report 28%
SLNB Clinical 1%
Self-report 5%
Clark et al. (11) Inter-limb volume (tape) >5% 36 months 188 20.7%
Francis et al. (12) Inter-limb volume and/or circumference (tape) >5% 12 months 155 ALND 47.1%
SLNB 16.8%
Langer et al. (13) Inter-limb circumference (tape) >2 cm
Self-report
ALND mean 29.5 months 659 ALND 19.1%
SLNB mean 31.0 months SLNB 3.5%
Hayes et al. (14) BIS > 3 SD 18 months 287 Point 6 months 10.7%
12 months 8.0%
18 months 14.9%
Cum. 6 months 10.7%
12 months 22.7%
18 months 33.6%
Stout Gergich et al. (15) Limb volume (perometry) >3% change from baseline 18 months 196 21.9%
Johansson and Branje (16) Limb volume (water disp) >5% change from baseline 12 months 292 ALND with radiation 38.7%
Armer and Stewart (6) Limb circumference (tape) >2 cm from baseline and/or contralateral limb
Limb volume (perometry) >200 ml from baseline and/or contralateral limb
Limb volume (perometry) >10% from baseline and/or contralateral limb
Self-report
60 months 236 12 months 66, 40, 22, and 32%
24 months 81, 56, 36, and 35%
36 months 88, 66, 43, and 39%
60 months 94, 83, 55, and 43%