Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 5;11(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s13014-016-0692-9

Table 2.

Prognostic factors related with overall survival (OS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), and disease-free survival (DFS)

OS LRFS DFS
Univariate Multivariate Univariate Multivariate Univariate Multivariate
(No. of patients) 5-year rate (%) p-value 5-year rate (%) p-value 5-year rate (%) p-value
Sex n-s n-s n-s
 Male (57) 94.4 92.6 90.9
 Female (26) 95.8 87.6 87.6
Age n-s n-s n-s
  < 70 (58) 98.2a 94.8 93.1
  ≥ 70 (25) 86.4 81.0 81.0
Location from anal verge n-s n-s n-s
  < 5 cm (33) 96.7 93.6 90.7
  ≥ 5 cm (50) 93.7 89.4 89.4
CEA level n-s n-s n-s
  < 3 ng/ml (49) 100 95.6 93.6
  ≥ 3 ng/ml (34)b 87.0 84.0 84.3
Tumor size n-s n-s n-s
  < 3 cm (62) 94.9 89.7 88.1
  ≥ 3 cm (21) 94.7 94.7 94.7
T-stage n-s n-s 0.027 (HR: 4.8, 95 % CI: 1.2–19.1)
 1 (68) 95.2 93.7 93.8a
 2 (15) 93.3 80.0 73.3
Resection margin n-s n-s n-s
  > 3 mm (3) 100 100 100
  ≤ 3 mm (22) 95.5 86.4 81.8
 Unknown (58) 94.3 92.1 92.1
LVI n-s n-s n-s
 No (41) 92.1 87.1 84.9
 Yes (13) 92.3 83.9 83.9
 Unknown (29) 100 100 100
Local excision n-s n-s n-s
 EMR or ESD (26) 92.0 88.1 88.1
 TAE (57) 96.2 92.2 90.5
Radiation dose n-s n-s n-s
  > 50.4 Gy (8) 100 100 100
  ≤ 50.4 Gy (75) 94.3 90.0 88.7
Adjuvant chemotherapy n-s n-s n-s
 Yes (14) 100 92.9 92.9
 No (69) 93.9 90.7 89.3

N-S not significant, LVI lymphovascular invasion, EMR endoscopic mucosal resection, ESD endoscopic submucosal dissection, TAE transanal excision, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, astatistically significant in univariate analysis, b Nine patients of unknown CEA level were included in this subgroup