Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 5;16(1):469. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1719-5

Table 4.

Subcategories (bold) of and a selection of detailed questions on the topic “strengths and benefits of the FFP” with survey results

Ratings from the survey
Seniors (n = 17) GPs (n = 25) HCNs (n = 12)
“yes” n (%) “yes” n (%) “yes” n (%)
General and specific benefits perceived by seniors
 Was the personal visit of the PT at your home helpful? 13 (76 %) NA NA
 Did you recognize your own risk of falling due to the consultation by the PT? 14 (82 %) NA NA
Interests of seniors
 Why did you participate?
 - GP or HCN recommended it to you. 10 (59 %) NA NA
 - You recognized the risk of falling and have been motivated to do something against it actively. 8 (47 %) NA NA
 - You have been interested in the degree of your own risk of falling. 8 (47 %) NA NA
 - Because of your confidence in the HCN. 6 (35 %) NA NA
Further offers desired by seniors
 Would you participate again if you had the possibility to do so? 9 (53 %) NA NA
PTs instructions followed by seniors
 Did you investigate changes in your home after the consultation by the PT (i.e. fixating carpets or signalize door sills)? 10 (59 %) NA NA
 Do you execute the instructed physical exercises received from the PT? 10 (59 %) NA NA
 Do you carry out further measures such as group therapies or physiotherapy after the consultation by the PT? 6 (35 %) NA NA
Project benefits perceived by GPs and HCNs
 Was the project useful to:
 - Prevent falls? NA 20 (80 %) 10 (83 %)
 - Draw attention to the risk of falling? NA 21 (84 %) 10 (83 %)
 - Detect sources of risk of falling? NA 18 (72 %) 8 (67 %)