Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 5;17(1):352. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1203-6

Table 5.

Speed comparison

Test Software Simulation S4 Simulation S5
NEAT R package neat 0.6 0.7
NEA R package neaGUI 2125.4 2151.5
LP CrossTalkZ 28.6 44.7
LA CrossTalkZ 14.4 18.0
LA+S CrossTalkZ 21.8 27.6
NP CrossTalkZ 12.9 15.8

The table compares the time (in seconds) that each method required to compute 1225 tests for enrichment in simulations S4 and S5, using a processor with 2.5 GhZ CPU frequency. NEAT turns out to be by far the fastest method