Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Endoscopy. 2015 Oct 1;48(2):A1–A13. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392803

Table 3.

Summary of clinico-pathological data for the 50 patients with Barrett’s esophagus who underwent examination with the multimodal endoscope followed by resection of the imaged areas for pathological examination.

Sex, n (%)
 Male 44 (88 %)
 Female 6 (12 %)
Age, mean ± SD (range), years 65.6 ± 10.2 (37 – 86)
Body mass index (BMI), mean ± SD, kg/m2 29.5 ± 6.3
Length of Barrett’s esophagus segment measured by Prague criteria, mean ± SD (range), cm
 Circumferential length (C) 1.8 ± 2.8 (0 – 9)
 Maximum length (M) 3.6 ± 3.1 (0 – 11)
Macroscopic description of imaged segment according to Paris classification, n (%)
 0 – Is protruded 3 (6 %)
 0 – IIa elevated 16 (32 %)
 0 – IIb flat 28 (56 %)
 0 – IIc depressed 3 (6 %)
Most advanced grade of pathology found on imaged segment, n (%)
 Squamous epithelium 3 (6 %)
 Barrett’s esophagus 3 (6 %)
 Gastroesophageal junction 4 (8 %)
 Low grade dysplasia 7 (14 %)
 High grade dysplasia 21 (42 %)
 Esophageal adenocarcinoma 12 (24 %)