Table 5.
Study 3 feasibility, convergent validity, and discriminant validity
Feasibility (% valid) | Convergent validity | Discriminant validity | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ID combined (study 3) |
Age 3–15, general populationa | ID combined (study 3) | Age 3–6, general populationa | ID combined (study 3) | Age 3–6, general populationa | |
DCCS | 72.2 % | 79.8 % | −.51* | .69*** | .65*** | .79*** |
KiTAP flexibility errors | WPPSI-III block design | PPVT-4 | ||||
Flanker | 77.8 % | 83.7 % | −.61*** | .60*** | .61*** | .67*** |
KiTAP distractibility | WPPSI-III block design | PPVT-4 | ||||
Picture vocabularyb | 100.0 % | 83.7 % | .92*** | .90*** | .53*** | .53*** |
PPVT-4 | Leiter-R forward + Spatial memory z score | BVMT-R + RAVLT | ||||
Oral readingb | 94.4 % | 98.1 % | 91*** | .96*** | .56*** | .53*** |
WJ-4 letter/word ID | WRAT-IV | Leiter-R forward + Spatial memory z score | BVMT-R + RAVLT | |||
Picture sequence memory | 88.9 % | 98.1 % | .57*** | .50*** | .64*** | .58*** |
Leiter-R forward + Spatial memory | NEPSY-II sentence repetition | PPVT-4 | ||||
Pattern comparison | 66.7 % | 94.4 % | −.40 | .43*** | .49** | .44*** |
KiTAP go/no-go median RT | WPPSI-III processing speed | PPVT-4 | ||||
List sorting | 52.8 % | 95.7 % | .76*** | .57*** | .76*** | .63*** |
SB-5 verbal WM | NEPSY-II sentence | PPVT-4 |
Validity data shown are Pearson’s correlations
*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001
aZelazo and Bauer [59]
bEstimates reported for the general population are aggregated across the entire child and adolescent sample ranging from 3 to 15 years old