Table 4.
Results of the calculations of the acceptability of the surveillance system of CSF by hunters
| Acceptability of the operation of the system | Trust in the system | Acceptability of the objective of the system | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| satisfaction with their own role (RP 0.6) (MV 0.3) (Mean 0.45) |
satisfaction with the relationships (RP 0) (MV 0.7) (Mean 0.35) |
consequences in a suspicious case (RP–1) (MV–1) (Mean–1) |
|||
| RP | −0.1 | 0.8 | −0.6 | ||
| MV | 0 | 0.7 | 0 | ||
| All hunters | −0.1 | 0.8 | −0.4 | ||
Abbreviations: RP indicates Rhineland-Palatinate, MV indicates Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania